1997
DOI: 10.1039/a701607g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of a Microwave-induced Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry System Using a Modified Plasma Torch Coupled With Pneumatic and Hydraulic High-pressure Nebulization

Abstract: Although the results obtained here must be considered prelimi-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All these values are substantially higher than those obtained for pure argon (2580 K) and helium (1990 K) plasmas with solution nebulization. Moreover, these values are higher than those reported for argon MIP for different microwave devices (surfatron: 2570 K, 8 TE 101 : 2500-2750 K, 26 MPT: 3600 K 27 ). The rotational temperatures obtained at low helium content in mixed-gas plasma are also higher than those for argon ICP with solution nebulization (3340-3500 K) 28,29 and for argon MIP with hydride generation (3740 K).…”
Section: Influence Of Helium Concentration On Ar + He Mip Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…All these values are substantially higher than those obtained for pure argon (2580 K) and helium (1990 K) plasmas with solution nebulization. Moreover, these values are higher than those reported for argon MIP for different microwave devices (surfatron: 2570 K, 8 TE 101 : 2500-2750 K, 26 MPT: 3600 K 27 ). The rotational temperatures obtained at low helium content in mixed-gas plasma are also higher than those for argon ICP with solution nebulization (3340-3500 K) 28,29 and for argon MIP with hydride generation (3740 K).…”
Section: Influence Of Helium Concentration On Ar + He Mip Parameterscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The design of TE101 cavity has been modied in the course of time. The idea presented by Jankowski et al 11 and Matusiewicz 10 is based on strong coupling between plasma load and the magnetron generator with all the phenomena (frequency pulling, exciting or damping of oscillations) used as tools importing a better stability of the MIP, while Geiger et al 13 added a circulator which in a conventional way separates the generator from the load. Therefore there cannot be any clear comparison between these two systems.…”
Section: Te101-rectangular Cavitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rectangular waveguide-based plasma cavities, both resonant and non-resonant, although unsymmetrical has found wide application as excitation sources for CEM of gases. 13,103,104 The arrangement of rectangular waveguide-unsymmetrically excited plasma is acceptable when the sample is in a gas form. For such cavities the power coupling efficiency approaches 100% while an ICP has a maximum coupling efficiency of about 50%.…”
Section: Atomic Mwp-oesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation