2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of fractionated skim milk with small-angle X-ray scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the use of MCI for small-angle scattering studies on casein micelles may induce undesirable artefacts. The use of skimmed milk powder, as done by Hansen et al (1996), Moitzi et al (2011), Jackson & McGillivray (2011), Pignon et al (2004) and Shukla et al (2009), or microfiltration retentates (Sørensen et al, 2013) will generally prevent the aforementioned solubility issue, but the presence of fat in skimmed milk powder is still an issue of concern here.…”
Section: Fat Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the use of MCI for small-angle scattering studies on casein micelles may induce undesirable artefacts. The use of skimmed milk powder, as done by Hansen et al (1996), Moitzi et al (2011), Jackson & McGillivray (2011), Pignon et al (2004) and Shukla et al (2009), or microfiltration retentates (Sørensen et al, 2013) will generally prevent the aforementioned solubility issue, but the presence of fat in skimmed milk powder is still an issue of concern here.…”
Section: Fat Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Roach and Harte [57] observed a significant reduction in particle size when pressures \250 MPa were applied to casein micelles and casein micelle isolates. However, UHPH at 300 MPa of fractionated milk concentrate affected casein micelles at pH 5.8, but not at pH 6.6 suggesting the need of some colloidal calcium phosphate dissociation to cause micellar disruption [73].…”
Section: Particle Disruption and Food Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Sodium ions will replace micellar calcium and increase the concentration of calcium ions in the serum phase, while acidification also transfer calcium from the colloidal to the soluble form (Gaucheron, 2010). Previous trials based on UHPH treated whey protein-depleted milk concentrate, showed an unchanged serum calcium level at 4% casein compared with non-UHPH treated samples, while at 8% casein a higher serum calcium level was observed when applying UHPH treatment (Sørensen et al, 2013). Increased destabilisation of the casein micelle with increased casein concentration followed by UHPH treatment could explain the higher soluble calcium level in the samples with 8% casein.…”
Section: Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few studies, all using piston-gap type homogenisers, have investigated the effect of UHPH treatment on the functional properties of whey protein-depleted or partial depleted milk concentrate solutions (Chevalier-Lucia, Blayo, Gr acia-Juli a, Picart-Palmade, & Dumay, 2011;Roach & Harte, 2008;Sørensen, Pedersen, Mortensen, & Ipsen, 2013). Roach and Harte (2008) described the changes in casein micelle size induced by different UHPH pressures (100,200,250,300 and 350 MPa) and levels of CaCl 2 (0, 5, 10 and 15 mM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation