2023
DOI: 10.1080/02670836.2022.2127984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of heat-treated gradient alloy steel fabricated by laser melting deposition

Abstract: A gradient alloy steel prepared by laser melting deposition (LMD) was subjected to two heat treatments (quenching-intercritical quenching denoted as Q-IQ and quenching-intercritical quenching-tempering denoted as Q-IQ-T). Results showed that martensite microstructure was changed to a duplex microstructure of martensite and ferrite after heat treatment, with a small number of Cr23C6 phases appearing. The samples before and after heat treatment exhibited random crystallographic orientation, while the grain was r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass loss of the untreated and LSMed samples in deionised water is 35 ± 1 and 14 ± 0.3 mg, whereas the mass loss in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution is 40 ± 0.6 and 20 ± 0.3 mg after 8-h CE, respectively. The mean depth of erosion ( MDE ) and the mean depth of erosion rate ( MDER ) can be used to evaluate CE resistance and calculated as follows: 357 where Δw is the mass loss (mg), ρ is the density of the materials (g/cm 3 ), s is the eroded area (1 cm 2 in this study), Δ T is the interval time (h), MDE in μm and MDER in μm/h. The CE resistance R e (h μm −1 ) is the reciprocal of MDER.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mass loss of the untreated and LSMed samples in deionised water is 35 ± 1 and 14 ± 0.3 mg, whereas the mass loss in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution is 40 ± 0.6 and 20 ± 0.3 mg after 8-h CE, respectively. The mean depth of erosion ( MDE ) and the mean depth of erosion rate ( MDER ) can be used to evaluate CE resistance and calculated as follows: 357 where Δw is the mass loss (mg), ρ is the density of the materials (g/cm 3 ), s is the eroded area (1 cm 2 in this study), Δ T is the interval time (h), MDE in μm and MDER in μm/h. The CE resistance R e (h μm −1 ) is the reciprocal of MDER.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the materials used in marine parts are supposed to obtain a combination of desirable properties such as high strength and ductility, high resistance to wear, corrosion and CE, while this combination is difficult to co-exist in a single bulk material, and even it does, manufacturing costs might be high. Fortunately, surface modification techniques [14][15][16][17] provide an effective way to solve the above problems through tailoring the surface properties while retaining the bulk properties. During the past decades, the development of surface modification against the wear, high-temperature oxidation and CE primarily relied on the protective coating with extensively expensive elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%