2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of impeller driven and oscillatory mixing by spatial and temporal shear rate distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to postulate that a moving particle in OBBC is much more frequently exposed to some kind of a local alternating change of solution direction than a particle in IDBC. In order to validate this proposition, CFD was used to model the hydrodynamic conditions, and evaluate the shear rate distributions in IDBC and OBBC 18. Our modeling analysis shows the following main findings.…”
Section: Summary Of Different Methods Used In the Assessment Of Partimentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, it is reasonable to postulate that a moving particle in OBBC is much more frequently exposed to some kind of a local alternating change of solution direction than a particle in IDBC. In order to validate this proposition, CFD was used to model the hydrodynamic conditions, and evaluate the shear rate distributions in IDBC and OBBC 18. Our modeling analysis shows the following main findings.…”
Section: Summary Of Different Methods Used In the Assessment Of Partimentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Mumtaz's work has found applications in industrial crystallisation (Braun et al, 2004;Brunsteiner et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2003;Chew et al, 2004;Falk et al, 2011;Hollander et al, 2003;Ilievski, 2001;Ilievski and Livk, 2006;Kramer and Jansens, 2003;Li et al, 2001;Livk and Ilievski, 2007;Rielly and Marquis, 2001;Wang et al, 2006;Yokota et al, 1999;Zauner and Jones, 2000), precipitation (Lakshminarayanan and Valiyaveettil, 2003;Lewis and Mangere, 2011;Lindenberg et al, 2008;Lawler, 2008, 2010;Wagterveld et al, 2012;Wan et al, 2011), nanoprecipitation (Jia et al, 2008;Pujol et al, 2004;Schwarzer and Peukert, 2005;Schwarzer et al, 2006), population balance modelling (Balakin et al, 2012;Briesen, 2006;Briesen, 2007;Derksen, 2002;Hollander et al, 2001a;Hollander et al, 2002;Hollander et al, 2001b;Mersmann et al, 2002;Reinhold and Briesen, 2012;Sgraja et al, 2010) and colloid science (Gruy, 2012;Kind, 2002).…”
Section: ¼ Strength Of the Neck Hydrodynamic Disruptive Force ð1þmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15,16 Crystal product quality can be particularly sensitive to the shear rate distribution during crystallisation. 17,18 Chew et al, 18 investigated the shear rate distribution and flow patterns in a stirred tank and in a moving baffle oscillatory crystalliser (MBOC) using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). They showed that in an MBOC, particles spend most of their time in the high shear regions whilst in the STC/MSMPR particles reside mainly in regions of low shear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%