2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92991-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of Parallel Independence in AGREE-Rewriting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This property is satisfied by adhesive categories (cf. Lemma 3 of Appendix A), yet to the best of our knowledge the question of which more general types of categories possess this property has not yet been investigated to quite the level of generality as analogous classification problems in the case of DPO rewriting, even though there does exist a large body of work on classes of categories that admit SqPO constructions [16,39,36,14,37]. Within these classes, according to [13,14] guarantees for the existence of FPCs may be provided for categories that possess a so-called M -partial map classifier.…”
Section: Background: Adhesive Categories and Final Pullback Complementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property is satisfied by adhesive categories (cf. Lemma 3 of Appendix A), yet to the best of our knowledge the question of which more general types of categories possess this property has not yet been investigated to quite the level of generality as analogous classification problems in the case of DPO rewriting, even though there does exist a large body of work on classes of categories that admit SqPO constructions [16,39,36,14,37]. Within these classes, according to [13,14] guarantees for the existence of FPCs may be provided for categories that possess a so-called M -partial map classifier.…”
Section: Background: Adhesive Categories and Final Pullback Complementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kreowski [17] tackled the problem of parallel graph transformations and introduced the notion of parallel independence. This pioneering work has been considered for several algebraic graph transformation approaches, see [15] as well as the more recent contributions [7,26,25]. At almost the same period, parallel graph transformations has been used as an extension of L-systems [29,31] as was proposed in, e.g., [21].…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kreowski [14] tackled the problem of parallel graph transformations and proposed conditions under which parallel graph transformations could be sequentialized and how sequential independent graph transformations could be parallelized. This pioneering work has been considered for several algebraic graph transformation approaches, see, e.g., the most recent contributions [9,22,21] or Volume 3 of the Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation [12]. However, this stream of work departs drastically from our goal where parallel graph transformations are not aimed to be sequentialized.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%