2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of seafloor substrate using advanced processing of multibeam bathymetry, backscatter, and sidescan sonar in Table Bay, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MBES systems can typically collect high-resolution bathymetry (the travel time of the sound), water column [11], and backscatter (the intensity of the returned signal) data simultaneously [1,[12][13][14]. Therefore, the MBES systems have a wide range of applications, which include: the acquisition of bathymetric data [15][16][17]; hydrographic charting [4,7,18]; habitat mapping [4,9,12,[18][19][20]; the analysis of the benthic fauna [21]; the production of thematic maps [22]; tidal channels modeling [23]; geomorphometric analysis [2,[24][25][26]; seafloor facies classification [4,27,28]; habitat suitability modeling [29,30]; the mapping of underwater archaeological sites [31][32][33][34][35][36]; morphological and sedimentological evolution [7,37]; the mapping of seafloor substrates [38]; geohazard assessments [39]; analyzing the challenges associated with climate change [40]; modeling the ocean circulation [41]; monitoring marine infrastructure development [42]; fisheries assessments…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MBES systems can typically collect high-resolution bathymetry (the travel time of the sound), water column [11], and backscatter (the intensity of the returned signal) data simultaneously [1,[12][13][14]. Therefore, the MBES systems have a wide range of applications, which include: the acquisition of bathymetric data [15][16][17]; hydrographic charting [4,7,18]; habitat mapping [4,9,12,[18][19][20]; the analysis of the benthic fauna [21]; the production of thematic maps [22]; tidal channels modeling [23]; geomorphometric analysis [2,[24][25][26]; seafloor facies classification [4,27,28]; habitat suitability modeling [29,30]; the mapping of underwater archaeological sites [31][32][33][34][35][36]; morphological and sedimentological evolution [7,37]; the mapping of seafloor substrates [38]; geohazard assessments [39]; analyzing the challenges associated with climate change [40]; modeling the ocean circulation [41]; monitoring marine infrastructure development [42]; fisheries assessments…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seafloor habitat mappers have utilized machine learning classification methods to improve the identification of seafloor characteristics using hydroacoustic data, oceanographic variables, and ground-truth samples [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Some of the most common modelling techniques are classification tree analysis (CTA), generalized boosted models (GBM), artificial neural networks (ANN), and most prominently, random forest (RF) [11,[16][17][18][19][20]. Comparisons of different classification modelling techniques have been conducted but there is no consensus in the literature on which model performs best [16,19,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most common modelling techniques are classification tree analysis (CTA), generalized boosted models (GBM), artificial neural networks (ANN), and most prominently, random forest (RF) [11,[16][17][18][19][20]. Comparisons of different classification modelling techniques have been conducted but there is no consensus in the literature on which model performs best [16,19,21,22]. Some studies attempted to address this issue by combining multiple modelling algorithms (ensemble modelling) to derive accurate spatial predictions of seafloor sediment [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seafloor habitat mappers have utilized machine learning classification methods to improve the identification of seafloor characteristics using hydroacoustic data, oceanographic variables, and ground-truth samples [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Some of the most common modelling techniques are classification tree analysis (CTA), generalized boosted models (GBM), artificial neural networks (ANN), and most prominently, random forest (RF) [2,[7][8][9][10][11]. Comparisons of different classification modelling techniques have been conducted, but there is no consensus in the literature on which model performs best [7,10,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most common modelling techniques are classification tree analysis (CTA), generalized boosted models (GBM), artificial neural networks (ANN), and most prominently, random forest (RF) [2,[7][8][9][10][11]. Comparisons of different classification modelling techniques have been conducted, but there is no consensus in the literature on which model performs best [7,10,12,13]. Some studies attempted to address this issue by combining multiple modelling algorithms (ensemble modelling) to derive accurate spatial predictions of seafloor sediment [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%