2015
DOI: 10.1071/wf14214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of the fuel and fire environment in southern Ontario’s tallgrass prairie

Abstract: Prescribed burning can be an integral part of tallgrass prairie restoration and management. Understanding fire behaviour in this fuel is critical to conducting safe and effective prescribed burns. Our goal was to quantify important physical characteristics of southern Ontario’s tallgrass fuel complex prior to and during prescribed burns and synthesise our findings into useful applications for the prescribed fire community. We found that the average fuel load in tallgrass communities was 0.70 kg m–2. Fuel loads… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, differences in heat released per unit of fuel burned, and the completeness with which fuel burned, are unlikely to explain why grasses increased fire intensity more strongly than did forbs per unit biomass. We assumed a constant heat yield per unit biomass because the heat of combustion of various grass and forb species had a coefficient of variation in only 5.3% in a Canadian tallgrass prairie (Kidnie, ), and 1.2% in a South American grassland (Britton, Dodd, & Weichert, ). We also assumed complete combustion; if (coarser) forbs were less completely consumed by fire than (finer) grasses then intensity would be over‐estimated for forbs more than for grasses, making our inference that grasses more strongly increase fireline intensity conservative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, differences in heat released per unit of fuel burned, and the completeness with which fuel burned, are unlikely to explain why grasses increased fire intensity more strongly than did forbs per unit biomass. We assumed a constant heat yield per unit biomass because the heat of combustion of various grass and forb species had a coefficient of variation in only 5.3% in a Canadian tallgrass prairie (Kidnie, ), and 1.2% in a South American grassland (Britton, Dodd, & Weichert, ). We also assumed complete combustion; if (coarser) forbs were less completely consumed by fire than (finer) grasses then intensity would be over‐estimated for forbs more than for grasses, making our inference that grasses more strongly increase fireline intensity conservative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate fireline intensity (rate of energy release per unit length of fire front, Byram, ), we multiplied the forward rate of spread by the fuel load (approximated as biomass per unit area late the previous summer) and the approximate heat of combustion 20 MJ/kg (Williams, Gill, & Moore, ). We assumed the heat of combustion to be constant across species compositions because it is very similar across herbaceous species (Byram, ; Kidnie, ). We calculated reaction intensity per unit area by dividing fireline intensity by the flaming zone depth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During each fire, wind speed (m s −1 ), air temperature (°C), and relative humidity (%) were recorded every five minutes, similar to methods of Kidnie and Wotton (2015), using an in situ automatic weather station (reference number SM55PRO; Inovalley, Pontoise, France) placed at 2 m aboveground, in the fire break between two adjacent plots. The recorded values were averaged over the period of fire propagation for each plot.…”
Section: Weathermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for tall grasses, the reported range of values is 16.8 to 19.1 MJ/kg [53,54]. The averaged value of 17.3 MJ/kg was found by Kidnie [34] for different tall grasses. From the experimental research on several Mediterranean shrub species (tested twigs and leaves), the heating value was between 19.9 and 22.9 MJ/kg [55].…”
Section: Fire Load Density Of Green Roofsmentioning
confidence: 99%