Designing effective monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics face a significant challenge known as “developability”, which reflects an antibody’s ability to progress through development stages based on its physicochemical properties. While natural antibody repertoires may provide valuable guidance for antibody selection, we lack a comprehensive understanding of natural developability parameter (DP) plasticity (redundancy, predictability, sensitivity) and how the DP landscapes of human-engineered and natural antibodies relate to one another. These knowledge gaps hinder fundamental developability profile cartography. To chart natural and engineered DP landscapes, we computed 40 sequence- and 46 structure-based DPs of over two million native and human-engineered single-chain antibody sequences. We found lower redundancy among structure-based compared to sequence-based DPs. Sequence DP sensitivity to single amino acid substitutions varied by antibody region and DPs, and structure DP values varied across the conformational ensemble of antibody structures. Sequence DPs were more predictable than structure-based ones across different machine learning (ML) tasks and embeddings, indicating a constrained sequence-based design space. Human-engineered antibodies were localized within the developability and sequence landscapes of natural antibodies, suggesting that human-engineered antibodies explore mere subspaces of the natural one. Our work charts a roadmap to evaluate the plasticity of antibody developability, providing a more rational perspective for therapeutic mAb design.