2016
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of the surface structure of 3D printed scaffolds for cell infiltration and surgical suturing

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk Abstract3D printing is of great interest for tissue engineering scaffolds due to the ability to form complex geometries and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The free and fracture surfaces of the CaP frameworks are presented in Figure 11 A,B, respectively. The CaP frameworks revealed high densification but a rough surface ( Figure 11 A), which is advantageous for the attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblasts when used as bone scaffolds [ 42 , 43 ]. In addition, only some residual pores were observed on the fracture surface ( Figure 11 B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free and fracture surfaces of the CaP frameworks are presented in Figure 11 A,B, respectively. The CaP frameworks revealed high densification but a rough surface ( Figure 11 A), which is advantageous for the attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblasts when used as bone scaffolds [ 42 , 43 ]. In addition, only some residual pores were observed on the fracture surface ( Figure 11 B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSM printing used heated syringes (at 60˚C) on a 3D Discovery® bioprinter (RegenHU). PCL (M n = 40,000 - 50,000 g/mol; Sigma-Aldrich, UK) was printed at 77°C using a precision extrusion deposition system as described in [21] . The material was extruded through a 23 gauge nozzle (0.33mm) steel nozzle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The printhead travelled at a speed of 12 mm/s and the pressure for printing PLGA was 4 bar. 29 The PLGA 3D-printed scaffolds have well-defined structure and regular pore size, and the distribution of pore size is centralized, result in a higher transparency and porosity, see Figure 1 Hydroxyapatite powder ([Ca5(OH)(PO4)3]x), with particle size < 200m, was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (CAS number: 12167-74-7). Fresh chicken skin samples (thickness 0.5 -1 mm) were obtained from a local supermarket.…”
Section: Spatially Offset Raman Spectroscopy (Sors)mentioning
confidence: 99%