2021
DOI: 10.1177/0300060521993642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterisation of two unusual cases of haemoglobin Bart’s hydrops foetalis caused by –SEA and large novel α-globin gene cluster deletions

Abstract: Background We describe 2 unusual haemoglobin (Hb) Bart’s hydrops cases that could not be explained by traditional factors. Case presentation: Two families with a diagnosis or history of foetal hydrops were enrolled. A suspension-array system was used to detect the 23 most frequent mutations in southern China. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was used to screen for possible deletions. Precise characterisation of the breakpoints of the novel variants and uniparental disomy analysis were pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the MLPA method can omit small deletions as the probes are not continuous or overlapping. In addition, the distance between many MLPA probes ranges between 3 and 10 kb; hence, if the CNV breakpoints extend beyond the range of MLPA probes, the use of array CGH analysis is required for size and localisation determination and also the use of GAP-PCR/CBAS and DNA sequencing for complete identification of the breakpoints [13,30]. The whole procedure is time-consuming and labour-intensive, making the characterisation of unknown CNVs highly complicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the MLPA method can omit small deletions as the probes are not continuous or overlapping. In addition, the distance between many MLPA probes ranges between 3 and 10 kb; hence, if the CNV breakpoints extend beyond the range of MLPA probes, the use of array CGH analysis is required for size and localisation determination and also the use of GAP-PCR/CBAS and DNA sequencing for complete identification of the breakpoints [13,30]. The whole procedure is time-consuming and labour-intensive, making the characterisation of unknown CNVs highly complicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%