1999
DOI: 10.1007/s003960050388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterising latex particles and fractal aggregates using image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of the applied fitting relations for d f ) f(d pf ) and k f ) f(k pf ) or k f ) f(d f ) described above was estimated in the following two ways. In the first case, d f and k f were evaluated individually from d pf and k pf obtained from 2D projections of 58 (Figure 15) 9.6 × 10 -6 1.18 0.113 Tang et al 59 (Figure 4) b 1.2 × 10 -6 1.00 0.036 Tang et al 59 (Figures 7 and 8) 1.2 × 10 -6 1.16 0.118 Xiao et al 60 (Figure 8b) c 1.1 × 10 -6 1.10 0.078 Soos et al 13 (Figure 9) d 8.1 × 10 -7 1.20 0.123 Ehrl et al 61 6.0 × 10 -7 1.17 0.110 Soos et al 62 8.1 × 10 -7 1.16 0.091 Kilps et al 63 (Figure 2b) e 1.5 × 10 -4 1.43 0.179 Logan and Kilps 64 (Figure 1a and b) 9.2 × 10 -7 1.29 0.136 Tang et al 65 (Figure 1 and 2) f 2.0 × 10 -6 1.44 0.241 Drakopoulou et al 66 (Figure 1a 62 . The latter relation provided d p for Sterling SO.…”
Section: Mass and Perimeter Fractal Dimension And Scaling Prefactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the applied fitting relations for d f ) f(d pf ) and k f ) f(k pf ) or k f ) f(d f ) described above was estimated in the following two ways. In the first case, d f and k f were evaluated individually from d pf and k pf obtained from 2D projections of 58 (Figure 15) 9.6 × 10 -6 1.18 0.113 Tang et al 59 (Figure 4) b 1.2 × 10 -6 1.00 0.036 Tang et al 59 (Figures 7 and 8) 1.2 × 10 -6 1.16 0.118 Xiao et al 60 (Figure 8b) c 1.1 × 10 -6 1.10 0.078 Soos et al 13 (Figure 9) d 8.1 × 10 -7 1.20 0.123 Ehrl et al 61 6.0 × 10 -7 1.17 0.110 Soos et al 62 8.1 × 10 -7 1.16 0.091 Kilps et al 63 (Figure 2b) e 1.5 × 10 -4 1.43 0.179 Logan and Kilps 64 (Figure 1a and b) 9.2 × 10 -7 1.29 0.136 Tang et al 65 (Figure 1 and 2) f 2.0 × 10 -6 1.44 0.241 Drakopoulou et al 66 (Figure 1a 62 . The latter relation provided d p for Sterling SO.…”
Section: Mass and Perimeter Fractal Dimension And Scaling Prefactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-slopes method was used for fractal dimension measurements (14)(15)(16). Particle size can be described using a size distribution function n(L), defined by d N = n(L) d L, where d N is the number of particles per unit volume with size in the range L to L + d L. The characteristic length L can be any scale measure of size, e.g., diameter, volume, and maximum or average length.…”
Section: Fractal Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of latex aggregation have been done either on the aspect of size distributions (10-13) or on fractal natures (6,9,14). No result on disruption of latex aggregates by turbulent capillary flow has been reported yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, polymer nanoparticles will be used as building blocks for the nanoarchitecture of the future and for the tailoring of viable composite materials. [1][2][3][4] PTFE has attracted much attention because of its excellent frictional properties, chemical inertness, and environmental friendliness. [5][6][7] It has been employed as a matrix for polymer composites with a range of fillers and as material coating.…”
Section: Introductuonmentioning
confidence: 99%