2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterising porosity of multi-component mixtures in rotary mills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, PEPT has also been successfully used to non-invasively recover the Lagrangian trajectories of a radio-labelled particle in rotating drums by Ding et al (2001a), Ding et al (2001b) Ding et al (2002, Lim et al (2003), Govender et al (2011), and Sichalwe et al (2011).…”
Section: The Experimental Study Of Granular Motion In Rotating Drumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, PEPT has also been successfully used to non-invasively recover the Lagrangian trajectories of a radio-labelled particle in rotating drums by Ding et al (2001a), Ding et al (2001b) Ding et al (2002, Lim et al (2003), Govender et al (2011), and Sichalwe et al (2011).…”
Section: The Experimental Study Of Granular Motion In Rotating Drumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residence time distribution (RTD) approach for computing the time‐averaged velocity was previously developed for PEPT data in vibro‐fluidized beds and later adapted to tumbling mills . We adopt the procedures outline in Sichalwe et al to recover the velocity field and volume concentration maps presented in the Results section.…”
Section: Positron Emission Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residence time distribution (RTD) approach for computing the time‐averaged velocity was previously developed for PEPT data in vibro‐fluidized beds and later adapted to tumbling mills . We adopt the procedures outline in Sichalwe et al to recover the velocity field and volume concentration maps presented in the Results section. Noting that the drum length (W=285 mm) is longer than the axial FoV (230 mm), the analysis scheme identifies when the tracer has left the axial FoV by looking for time steps that are much larger than the average time step between data points.…”
Section: Positron Emission Particle Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%