2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterising the vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity within the Chalk aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the zone of higher thermal conductivity shown in Figure 8. A decrease in Chalk permeability with depth has also been reported (Williams et al, 2006), which would explain the decline in temperature change for the lower part of the borehole after the end of the test (Figure 8). …”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…This is consistent with the zone of higher thermal conductivity shown in Figure 8. A decrease in Chalk permeability with depth has also been reported (Williams et al, 2006), which would explain the decline in temperature change for the lower part of the borehole after the end of the test (Figure 8). …”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…4 and Williams et al 2006; the site corresponds to LOCAR site PL10). Three of these boreholes are open except for surface casing (PL10A, PL10B and PL10E); the others were completed with piezometers (PL10C, PL10D and PL10F).…”
Section: Field Measurements Of Spontaneous Potential Bottom Barn Abstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large distance between gas vents is another problem to assume uniform flow in the landfill. Another method to determine groundwater velocity is a borehole tracer method (Novakowski et al, 2006;Williams et al, 2006). This method involves monitoring the change in tracer concentration after tracer is injected into isolated area in a borehole spaced by inflated packers.…”
Section: Tracer Test For Leachate Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%