1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00876915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic curves for the inversion of magnetic anomalies of spherical ore bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 18 shows the curves intersect each other at z = 1,430 m and q = 2.58. This suggests that the shape of the buried structure resembles a spherical model buried at a depth of 1,430 m. The shape and the depth of the ore body obtained by the present method agrees very well with those obtained by RAO et al (1973), VERMA and BANDOPADHYAY (1975), PRAKASA RAO and SUBRAHMANYAM (1988), and ABDELRAHMAN et al (2007, 2013 as summarized in Table 2. Figure 19 presents a total magnetic anomaly above a Mesozoic diabase dike intruded into Paleozoic sediments from the Parnaiba basin, Brazil (SILVA 1989, Fig.…”
Section: Field Examplessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 18 shows the curves intersect each other at z = 1,430 m and q = 2.58. This suggests that the shape of the buried structure resembles a spherical model buried at a depth of 1,430 m. The shape and the depth of the ore body obtained by the present method agrees very well with those obtained by RAO et al (1973), VERMA and BANDOPADHYAY (1975), PRAKASA RAO and SUBRAHMANYAM (1988), and ABDELRAHMAN et al (2007, 2013 as summarized in Table 2. Figure 19 presents a total magnetic anomaly above a Mesozoic diabase dike intruded into Paleozoic sediments from the Parnaiba basin, Brazil (SILVA 1989, Fig.…”
Section: Field Examplessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Careful examination of the total, vertical and horizontal magnetic anomaly expressions of the sphere (meridian profile) (RAO et al 1977;PRAKASA RAO and SUBRAHMANYAM 1988), the horizontal cylinder (PRAKASA RAO et al 1986) and the thin sheet (GAY 1963) led to the following generalized formula which represents magnetic anomalies produced by most simple geologic models: Shape factor (q) for a sphere (total field) for a sphere (vertical field) for a sphere (horizontal field) for a horizontal, cylinder, thin sheet (FHD), geological contact (SHD) (all fields) for a thin sheet, geological contact (FHD) (all fields). In Eq.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following GAY (1963), PRAKASA RAO et al (1986), and PRAKASA RAO and SUBRAHMANYAN (1988), the magnetic anomaly produced by most geologic structures with the centre located at X i ¼ 0 can be represented by the following function…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These four simple geometric forms are convenient approximations to common geologic structures often encountered in the interpretation of magnetic data. Several graphical methods have been developed for interpreting residual magnetic anomalies due to simple models (GAY, 1963(GAY, , 1965PAUL, 1964;STANLEY, 1977;ATCHUTA RAO and RAM BABU, 1980;PRAKASA RAO et al, 1986;PRAKASA RAO and SUBRAHMANYAN, 1988). However, the drawback with these techniques is that they are highly subjective and therefore, can lead to major errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%