2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291703001296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic neurocognitive profile associated with adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Abstract: The demonstration of neuropsychological dysfunction in the adult ADHD cohort provides some support for the validity of this diagnosis in adulthood. In particular, there is broad consistency between the cognitive profile revealed in the current investigation and that previously demonstrated in a study of medication-naïve ADHD children. There is evidence that frontostriatal function is especially disrupted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
0
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
6
70
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous set-shifting studies in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans (Dias et al, 1996a,b;Birrell andBrown, 2000, Fox et al, 2003;McLean et al, 2004;Pantelis et al, 2004;Chudasama and Robbins, 2006;Jazbec et al, 2007), impairments during EDS for subjects with lesions of prefrontal cortex or parietal cortices, or brain degenerative diseases (e.g., schizophrenia), are unable to switch attention to a previously irrelevant dimension. Attention to the original relevant dimension remains strong in these subjects, and they are more vulnerable to perseveration to the stimuli of the previously relevant dimension, which becomes irrelevant when solving the EDS problem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similar to previous set-shifting studies in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans (Dias et al, 1996a,b;Birrell andBrown, 2000, Fox et al, 2003;McLean et al, 2004;Pantelis et al, 2004;Chudasama and Robbins, 2006;Jazbec et al, 2007), impairments during EDS for subjects with lesions of prefrontal cortex or parietal cortices, or brain degenerative diseases (e.g., schizophrenia), are unable to switch attention to a previously irrelevant dimension. Attention to the original relevant dimension remains strong in these subjects, and they are more vulnerable to perseveration to the stimuli of the previously relevant dimension, which becomes irrelevant when solving the EDS problem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, response inhibition is not the only executive process atypical in children with ADHD. Other domains, including working memory, set shifting, set maintenance, and planning have also been repeatedly identified as being atypical in the disorder (Barnett et al 2001;Clark et al 2000;Karatekin and Asarnow 1998;McLean et al 2004;Nigg et al 1998;Pennington and Ozonoff 1996). Importantly, as noted above, it is becoming clear that many of the brain regions and circuits related to the typical development of executive functioning are atypical in children with ADHD (see Sect.…”
Section: Executive (Top-down) Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Neuropsychological analyses have shown that patients with ADHD are impaired on the same tasks as those with prefrontal lesions, for example, tasks of behavioral inhibition, reward reversal, and working memory (Itami and Uno, 2002;Bedard et al, 2003;McLean et al, 2004). Although some neuropsychological studies disagree with the importance of executive function deficits in ADHD, these studies are often flawed by the use of inappropriate tasks for evaluating children (eg the Stroop color-naming interference task, which assumes that reading is a prepotent response that must be inhibited, an assumption often invalid in children; van Mourik et al, 2005), disagreement on which processes constitute executive functions (eg not including attention regulation parameters as executive functions; Schoechlin and Engel, 2005), or by the use of tasks with ceiling effects for this patient population.…”
Section: Prefrontal Cortical Dysfunction In Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%