2018
DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2018.1453751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and complexity of chronic pain patients referred to a community-based multidisciplinary chronic pain clinic

Abstract: Background: Community-based care fills an important service gap for patients living with chronic pain. Better understanding of unmet patient needs in the community may inform improved policy and resource allocation. Aims: The aim of this study was to describe patients presenting to a community-based, multidisciplinary chronic pain clinic in Vancouver, British Columbia. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 935 unique consecutive patients who completed an intake questionnaire between January… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
19
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the current sample differed to the existing literature regarding the percentage of employed participants, with more participants actively employed in the previously reported literature (range: 30.4%–67%), compared to the current sample (25%) [ 47 , 48 ]. In addition, the gender distribution was not comparable, with previous literature typically reporting fewer female participants (range: 57.4%–71.1%) than the current sample (95%); however, given the small sample size, caution should be used in making conclusions about the influence of the gender distribution on the present results [ 47 , 48 ]. Therefore, the demographic characteristics and baseline scores on several of the primary and secondary outcome measures are comparable to participants accessing other online pain programs and face-to-face multidisciplinary pain clinics.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the current sample differed to the existing literature regarding the percentage of employed participants, with more participants actively employed in the previously reported literature (range: 30.4%–67%), compared to the current sample (25%) [ 47 , 48 ]. In addition, the gender distribution was not comparable, with previous literature typically reporting fewer female participants (range: 57.4%–71.1%) than the current sample (95%); however, given the small sample size, caution should be used in making conclusions about the influence of the gender distribution on the present results [ 47 , 48 ]. Therefore, the demographic characteristics and baseline scores on several of the primary and secondary outcome measures are comparable to participants accessing other online pain programs and face-to-face multidisciplinary pain clinics.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The baseline scores of the current sample on several questionnaires (DASS-D; DASS-A; DASS-S; PHQ-9; PSEQ; TSK) were comparable to those reported by participants accessing Australian and Canadian face-to-face multidisciplinary pain clinics [ 47 , 48 ]. However, the current sample differed to the existing literature regarding the percentage of employed participants, with more participants actively employed in the previously reported literature (range: 30.4%–67%), compared to the current sample (25%) [ 47 , 48 ]. In addition, the gender distribution was not comparable, with previous literature typically reporting fewer female participants (range: 57.4%–71.1%) than the current sample (95%); however, given the small sample size, caution should be used in making conclusions about the influence of the gender distribution on the present results [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation for this lower than anticipated response could be related to the high level of pain and disability in the sample. Characteristics of patients attending chronic pain programs include poverty, financial stress, severe functional disability and past or current medical conditions [71]. We observed high scores for disability and the fact that questionnaires continued to be returned over a five-month period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Pain characteristics reported by the chronic pain group, regardless of interference level, were generally commensurate with those observed in pain specialty clinics, including moderateto-severe intensity pain, endorsement of multiple pain sites, and elevated pain-related negative affect. 28 The rate of chronic pain in this sample of young adults is remarkable given that pain populations and medicinal dispensaries were not targeted during recruitment and study advertisements emphasized health and wellness, not pain. These preliminary findings suggest that young adult cannabis users may be a useful target for psychosocial pain prevention and intervention programs, particularly if larger scale studies affirm that pain is overrepresented in this group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%