2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and Long-Term Prognosis of Patients ≤35 Years of Age with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and “Normal or Near Normal” Coronary Arteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our analysis, this subgroup of patients had a four times higher incidence of MACE than the controls, with worse clinical outcomes compared to patients with significant CAD. The study by Radillis et al found a better prognosis for these patients than for those with obstructive disease [ 32 ]. However, the results of the VIRGO study refer to a similar prognosis for both groups [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in our analysis, this subgroup of patients had a four times higher incidence of MACE than the controls, with worse clinical outcomes compared to patients with significant CAD. The study by Radillis et al found a better prognosis for these patients than for those with obstructive disease [ 32 ]. However, the results of the VIRGO study refer to a similar prognosis for both groups [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This affiliation warranted studying the polymorphism but the current study was unable to associate it with CAD. The important predictors of CAD including the traditional risk factors such as cholesterol, and family history of CAD; the novel serum parameter homocysteine; and genetic polymorphisms in MTHFR gene, altogether are robustly allied to CAD in previous literature [17,33,40,50,51]. These parameters, in essence, achieved statistical significance with CAD in current study.…”
Section: Factorsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…e prevalence of MINOCA is within 5-25% [8,9], closer to 6-10% in patients older than 40 years [9,10]. However, in young patients ≤35 years it is above 18%, which are the most affected population [11]. However, the characteristics of these very young patients have been poorly studied, and some classic risk factors for their clinical manifestation have not been defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%