2013
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8268.2013.12019.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and Macroeconomic Determinants of Youth Employment in Africa

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present the characteristics of youth employment in Africa as well as investigate its macroeconomic determinants, with a view to proffering some solutions. Our empirical estimates, using available cross-sectional data over the period [1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002][2003][2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009] show that a nation's domestic investment rate is found to be positively and significantly associated with youth employment in the overa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
73
1
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
23
73
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of a country is observed to have a decreasing effect on youth unemployment even though the statistical significance of the coefficient is weak. The level of a country's development measured by per capita real GDP is observed to have no statistically significant effect on youth unemployment in Africa, contrary to findings by Anyanwu (2013) that per capita real GDP has negative and statistically significant effects on youth employment, indicating a positive effect of per capita GDP on youth unemployment in Africa.…”
Section: Estimation Strategy and Analysis Of Resultscontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…The size of a country is observed to have a decreasing effect on youth unemployment even though the statistical significance of the coefficient is weak. The level of a country's development measured by per capita real GDP is observed to have no statistically significant effect on youth unemployment in Africa, contrary to findings by Anyanwu (2013) that per capita real GDP has negative and statistically significant effects on youth employment, indicating a positive effect of per capita GDP on youth unemployment in Africa.…”
Section: Estimation Strategy and Analysis Of Resultscontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Sackey and Osei () argued that younger people are more likely to be unemployed due to the fact that they have lower labour market skills relative to older cohorts. Anyanwu () cited a number of reasons that accounts for the labour market bias against young people including the fact that younger workers tend to be easier and less expensive to dismiss than older ones; they are likely to face the brunt of layoffs due to the perceived lower cost to establishments of releasing them relative to their older counterparts.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyanwu () used available cross‐sectional data over a period of 1991–2009 in Africa to show an increasing effect of a nation's domestic investment rate on youth employment and by implication a decreasing effect on youth unemployment in sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA) with the reverse reported in North Africa. He further found a statistically significant positive effect of real GDP growth on youth employment in SSA and North Africa suggesting a decreasing effect of economic growth on youth unemployment in Africa.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above review and following the frameworks posited by Chen (), Tseloni et al . (), Eastin and Prakash () and Anyanwu (, ), the relationship that we want to estimate can be written as: leftlogGEit=αi+β1log(rgdpit)+β2log(rgdp2)+β3(democit)+β4(democ2)+β5(Xit)+β6(Zit)+ϵit(i=1,....,N;t=1,.....,T) where GE is the measure of gender equality in country i at time t ; α i is a fixed effect reflecting time differences between countries; β 1 is the elasticity of gender equality with respect to real per capita income in 2000, rgdp ; β 2 is the gender equality elasticity with respect to quadratic real per capita GDP; β 3 is the coefficient of democracy, domec ; β 4 is the coefficient of the quadratic of democracy; X is the control variables, including domestic investment (percentage of GDP) ( inv ), foreign direct investment (percentage of GDP) ( fdi ), primary school enrolment ratio ( primedu ), secondary school enrolment ratio ( secedu ), urban population share ( urban ), and sex population ratio ( popratio ); Z represents year, sub‐regional and oil effects dummies used as fixed effects; and ϵ is an error term that includes errors in the gender equality measure. We use the North African dummy with its separate estimation to check if, indeed, North Africa is different.…”
Section: The Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%