BackgroundIn the present study, we obtained cycle threshold (Ct) values by qRT-PCR and compared them with clinical and laboratory data from saliva specimens of inpatients with COVID-19 and asymptomatic health workers (AHW).MethodsSaliva specimens from inpatients with COVID-19 and AHW were studied by qRT-PCR using three sets of primers for the N (N1, N2, and N3) gene of SARS-CoV-2. The Ct values obtained were compared with the clinical and laboratory data.ResultsData from 58 inpatients (37 critically ill patients and 21 patients with severe disease) and 105 AHW were analysed. In our system, the limit of viral detection corresponded to a Ct =46.5; therefore, our analysis focused on comparing the positivity rate obtained when using Ct <40 as the cut-off with that obtained using Ct <46 as the cut-off. The positivity rate was increased when the Ct cut-off of 46 was used as the criterion, yielding a sensitivity of 87.9% for patients and a sensitivity of 43% for AHW. The bivariate analysis revealed an association between Ct <40 for N2 and mechanical ventilation assistance among patients (p=0.013). In addition, the serological values of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate-transaminase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin and creatine kinase–MB (CK-MB) showed significant correlations with the Ct values of N1 and N3.ConclusionDue to the intrinsic characteristics of the qRT-PCR process, obtaining amplification curves implies the presence of an active viral replication process, while Ct values may correlate with some clinical data. Our results support the claim that physicians should be informed of the Ct values obtained during the amplification of viral markers, as well as the Ct values that correspond to the limit of detection for viral RNA, which vary according to the characteristics of each system and amplification protocol used.