Characteristics and outcomes of patients with primary abdominopelvic aggressive angiomyxoma: a retrospective review of 12 consecutive cases from a sarcoma referral center

Abstract

Background Aggressive angiomyxoma (AAM) is a rare mesenchymal tumor that mostly arises from the pelvic and perineal soft tissues. Few studies reported its characteristics and outcomes previously due to its rarity and challenges of treatments. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics as well as surgical and short-term survival outcomes of primary abdominopelvic AAM. Methods Medical records of patients who were admitted to surgery with pathological confirmation of primary abdominopelvic AAM at Peking University International Hospital from January 2016 through December 2021 were retrospectively retrieved from our retroperitoneal tumor database. Demographics, operative outcomes and pathological findings were collected. Patients received followed-up routinely after the surgery. Survival probabilities were calculated and determined through Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results A total of 12 consecutive patients (male/female 4:8) were included in this study. The median age was 45 years old. The clinical presentation varied among individuals, consisting of 2 abdominal discomforts, 4 constipations, 1 lumbago, 1 prolonged menstruation, and 1 buttock swelling. R0/R1 resection was achieved in 100% of patients. Postoperatively, 50% of patients developed various complications including 3 fistulas and 3 wound infections. No operative mortality was observed. Histopathology of all patients was suggestive of AAM. Immunohistochemistry was done with a 91.7% positive rate for estrogen and progesterone receptors. The median recurrence-free survival time was 38 months. There were no cases of deceased or presented with distal metastasis during a median of 42 months’ follow-up. Conclusions The clinical manifestations of abdominopelvic AAM are mostly atypical. Surgical resection with curative intents remains the mainstay treatment of this disease, which was strongly suggested in experienced sarcoma centers due to the high probability of severe postoperative complications. In addition, long-term follow-up is necessary due to the high rate of local recurrences.