Characteristics and perceptions of twice-weekly webinars for primary care physicians in Japan: a qualitative study

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore the characteristic features and perceived value of free twice-weekly webinars predominantly focusing on the continuing professional development of primary care physicians in Japan. MethodsIn this qualitative study, we conducted a focus group of the webinars’ participants (n=6, a purposive sample). The discussion was recorded, with the recording subsequently transcribed, separated into meaningful segments and then open-coded until thematic saturation was reached. Concepts were generated through selective coding. Finally, the extracted concepts were grouped into categories. ResultsExtracted concepts were grouped into five categories: technological breakthroughs, the creation of learning opportunities, external interaction, stimulation of internal interaction, and the advantages and disadvantages of nationwide expansion. The webinars were perceived to provide a comfortable learning climate, enabling physicians to teach one another, share their experiences and become virtual colleagues. The chat system stimulated real-time interaction between both a main speaker and participants and the participants. Participants were able to ask questions or give comments in a stress-free atmosphere. The webinars were found to elicit real-time, internal interaction within participating sites without interrupting the sessions. Participants also highly valued the absence of commercial sponsorship. The expansion of the webinars raised two concerns: the possibility of speakers becoming nervous and the increased burden on the organizers. ConclusionsThe webinars have successfully allowed sharing of unbiased information and experiences in a comfortable, multifaceted interactive learning environment, enabling participants to feel connected. The chat system permitted interaction not feasible in face-to-face learning opportunities and has shown great promise as a means of online medical education.

Utility of a webinar to educate trainees on UK core surgical training (CST) selection – A cross sectional study and future implications amidst the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Overall, there are numerous advantages to webinars in medical education. As well as the accessibility of this learning platform, webinars can be recorded and archived allowing anyone to benefit from the session at a later date [ 30 ]. Furthermore, the webinar can be played back for repeated viewing if delegates wish to re-visit an important topic or discussion point.…”

“…Despite the numerous advantages of webinars highlighted in the literature, there are several negative aspects of webinars [ 12 , 13 , 16 , 19 , 30 , 31 ]. The presenter does not see the listeners, especially if presenting to large groups, as was the case in this webinar.…”

Utility and perceptions about web-based academics among physicians during COVID-19 pandemic

“…In a qualitative study by Kimura et al ., webinars were found to be the mode of sharing true information and developments around wider geographical distribution easily and conveniently. [ 20 ] Webinars were not only cost-effective but also a platform equally feasible for all for person to person interaction. This provides a hint towards an effective emerging online module for medical academics.…”

Webinar as Future of Continued Medical Education: a Survey

“…As found in our survey and highlighted in literature also, there are numerous advantages of webinars such as they can be recorded allowing anyone to benefit from the session at a later date [ 3 ]. Studies have mentioned several negative aspects of webinars such as poor engagement of listeners as the presenter does not see the listeners and the option to record webinars for future reference [ 3 , 4 ]. Studies have proposed that a break in conversation during webinar is needed as interruptions can be more disruptive.…”

“…Studies have proposed that a break in conversation during webinar is needed as interruptions can be more disruptive. Others have felt that similar problems like poor internet connection and technical glitches can adversely affect the quality of the session [ 4 , 5 ]. The main limitation of our study is that it is a single-centre study with a small sample size.…”