2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.71.046406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and scaling of tungsten-wire-arrayz-pinch implosion dynamics at 20 MA

Abstract: We present observations for 20-MA wire-array z pinches of an extended wire ablation period of 57%+/-3% of the stagnation time of the array and non-thin-shell implosion trajectories. These experiments were performed with 20-mm-diam wire arrays used for the double- z -pinch inertial confinement fusion experiments [M. E. Cuneo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 215004 (2002)] on the Z accelerator [R. B. Spielman, Phys. Plasmas 5, 2105 (1998)]. This array has the smallest wire-wire gaps typically used at 20 MA (209 microm ). T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wire-array implosions are dominated by the ablation of about half the initial mass into the array interior before the implosion begins, a consequence of the large skin depth of the current and the small diameter of the wires. [9][10][11] By contrast, the thickness of the cylindrical tube liners proposed for magnetized liner inertial fusion 6 exceeds the skin depth of the proposed current pulse, and no significant prefilling of the interior volume is expected. The remaining published controlled studies of MRT growth were PHYSICS OF PLASMAS 18, 056301 (2011) done on multimicrosecond generators in which the imploding liners have significant material strength and remain in liquid or solid states for much of the implosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Wire-array implosions are dominated by the ablation of about half the initial mass into the array interior before the implosion begins, a consequence of the large skin depth of the current and the small diameter of the wires. [9][10][11] By contrast, the thickness of the cylindrical tube liners proposed for magnetized liner inertial fusion 6 exceeds the skin depth of the proposed current pulse, and no significant prefilling of the interior volume is expected. The remaining published controlled studies of MRT growth were PHYSICS OF PLASMAS 18, 056301 (2011) done on multimicrosecond generators in which the imploding liners have significant material strength and remain in liquid or solid states for much of the implosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These plasmas are accelerated toward the array axis by magnetic pressure and accumulate there to form M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT a precursor column, while the cold-dense wire cores are stable in their original positions and keep ablating. Experimental results show that the basic processes of wire-array ablation on the 20-MA Z machine [32] are similar to that on the smaller current facilities such as ANGARA [33], MAGPIE [34] and COBRA [35]. The ablation rate of wire core is axially nonuniform, and the ablated plasmas will carry a significant fraction of current.…”
Section: Ablation and Initializationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…3A). The difference likely lies with the details of the wire-array dynamics not included in the simulations, and in particular the generation of trailing mass as the array mass is increased at these lower array diameters [27,36]. Additionally, the power exiting the bottom REH gradually decreases relative to the top as the diameter increases.…”
Section: Outer Array Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Measurements suggest the disruption may extend as much as 3 mm above or below the cathode or anode surface, [43] and is related to the axial radiation asymmetry discussed in Section VIII. The power decrease may also be caused, in part, by closure of the AK gap defined by the upper and lower pinch electrodes by trailing mass that shunts the current at large radii [27,36]. Figure 7A illustrates the development of the mass-driven shock from the impact of the wire arrays on the pedestal target (Fig.…”
Section: Target Length Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%