City Distribution and Urban Freight Transport 2011
DOI: 10.4337/9780857932754.00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics and Typology of Last-mile Logistics from an Innovation Perspective in an Urban Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
136
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
136
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The main characteristic is that load's volumes are small but the number of deliveries, and more so their frequency, have sharply increased. This fact has motivated a change in urban traffic towards a greater use of motorbikes and bicycles for commercial deliveries [6].…”
Section: Urban Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main characteristic is that load's volumes are small but the number of deliveries, and more so their frequency, have sharply increased. This fact has motivated a change in urban traffic towards a greater use of motorbikes and bicycles for commercial deliveries [6].…”
Section: Urban Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, LML denotes the last segment of a delivery process, which is often regarded as the most expensive, least efficient aspect of a supply chain and with the most pressing environmental concerns (Gevaers et al, 2011). Early definitions of LML were narrowly stated as the "extension of supply chains directly to the end consumer"; that is, a home delivery service for consumers Kull et al, 2007).…”
Section: Defining Lmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing definitions (details available from the authors) appear incomplete in capturing the complexities driven by e-commerce, such as omission in defining an origin (Esper et al, 2003;Kull et al, 2007;Gevaers et al, 2011;Ehmke and Mattfeld, 2012;Dablanc et al, 2013;Harrington et al, 2016); exclusion of in-store order fulfilment processes as a fulfilment option (Hübner, Kuhn and Wollenburg, 2016); and/or non-specification of the destination (or end point), including failure to capture the collection delivery point (CDP) as a reception option (Esper et al, 2003; 309 Consumerdriven e-commerce Kull et al, 2007). Without a consistent and robust definition of LML, the design of LML models is problematic.…”
Section: Defining Lmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Growing customer expectations have resulted in the need to radically improve services -with requirements for more customised service offerings (Punakivi, Yrjölä and Holmström, 2001;Bhagwat and Sharma, 2007;Gevaers, van de Voorde and Vanelslander, 2010;Angheluta and Costea, 2011). A continued lack of visibility on deliveries remains a significant source of dissatisfaction in this area, with a significant number of consumers deterred from utilising the full potential of internet-based shopping solutions -41% of UK customers were recently shown to be dissatisfied with 'tracking, while in transit' aspects of online purchasing (the estimated total number of UK internet users is now close on 72 million) (UPS, 2013) Service attributes, in terms of the 'customer', have often been categorised using the SERVQUAL framework, which applies the five dimensions of tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy to define service quality (Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Berry, 1988).…”
Section: Consumer Design Criteria Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%