2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
544
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 792 publications
(568 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
544
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Frontier methodologies can provide a composite inefficiency score that represents the observed firm's distance to the best practice eco-efficiency frontier (Charnes et al 1978;Kuosmanen and Kortelainen 2005;Färe et al 1989Färe et al , 2005. The efficiency frontier represents the collection of firms that produce more desirable outputs with fewer inputs and undesirable outputs than the other firms in the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frontier methodologies can provide a composite inefficiency score that represents the observed firm's distance to the best practice eco-efficiency frontier (Charnes et al 1978;Kuosmanen and Kortelainen 2005;Färe et al 1989Färe et al , 2005. The efficiency frontier represents the collection of firms that produce more desirable outputs with fewer inputs and undesirable outputs than the other firms in the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Athanassopoulos et al (1999) took fuel, controllable costs and capital expenditure as inputs; generated pollution and accidents incurred as bad outputs, and electricity produced and plant availability as good outputs while (Burnett and Hansen, 2008) deployed capital, fuel costs, and operating costs as inputs, SO2 emission as bad output and generated power as good output. In a very similar study to ours, Färe et al (2005) employed labor, installed capacity, and fuel as inputs and SO2 emission and generated power as undesirable and desirable outputs, respectively. More recently, Sueyoshi and Goto (2011) used generation capacity, number of employees, coal, oil, and LNG 9 as inputs, CO2 emission as bad output and generation as good output for their study.…”
Section: Operational Availability/ Deviation From Generation Planmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8 See, e.g. Coggins and Swinton (1996); Färe et al (1989Färe et al ( , 1993Färe et al ( , 2005; Grosskopf (1996) Førsund (2009,2016) points out the assumption of weak-disposability by using single trade-off between desirable and undesirable outputs is still in conflict with the material balance principle even abatement is explicitly introduced. Murty et al (2012) indicate the property of the weak-disposability approach might result in counterintuitive implications for trade-offs between inputs, good outputs and bad outputs.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%