2000
DOI: 10.13031/2013.2745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Actively Eroding Ephemeral Gullies in an Experimental Channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that detachment is active between upslope and midslope, while downslope positions are efficient in transporting the eroded sediment. The results are comparable with other studies available in literature (Bennett et al, 2000;Cochrane and Flanagan, 1997;Lei et al, 2001;Merten et al, 2001). Cochrane and Flanagan (1997) found that detachment decreases with the introduction of sediment at the top of the rill.…”
Section: K E Seutloali and H R Beckedahl: Understanding The Factosupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that detachment is active between upslope and midslope, while downslope positions are efficient in transporting the eroded sediment. The results are comparable with other studies available in literature (Bennett et al, 2000;Cochrane and Flanagan, 1997;Lei et al, 2001;Merten et al, 2001). Cochrane and Flanagan (1997) found that detachment decreases with the introduction of sediment at the top of the rill.…”
Section: K E Seutloali and H R Beckedahl: Understanding The Factosupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The dimensions of rills that extended continuously from the top to the bottom of the roadcuts changed significantly downslope. Previous research has indicated that significant changes in rill dimensions are determined by soil detachment and deposition along the length of the rill (Bennett et al, 2000;Lei and Nearing, 1998). In this study, a decrease in rill depth downslope suggests that a progressive increase in sediment load downslope decreases detachment rate (Lei and Nearing, 1998).…”
Section: K E Seutloali and H R Beckedahl: Understanding The Factomentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is ap proximately the same magnitude as that of sheet erosion, and has thus far not been ac counted for in any hazard analysis. Bennett et al (2000) presented estimates for the percentage of total soil loss from agricultural watersheds due to ephemeral gullies ranging from 20 to 100%. While there is currently no method in the Czech Republic for identifying and predicting the occurrence of sediment delivery from this type of erosion, it needs to be seriously considered, due to its share of the total erosion rate.…”
Section: Sheet and Ephemeral Gully Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leopold and Maddock, 1953;Leopold and Miller, 1956;Thornes, 1970Thornes, , 1974Graf, 1971;Hamlin and Thornes, 1974;Gilley et al, 1990;Govers, 1992;Foster et al, 1984;Abrahams et al, 1996;Di Stefano et al, 2013) and simulated experiments under controlled laboratory conditions (e.g. Lane and Foster, 1980;Foster et al, 1984;Sidorchuk, 1998;Bennett et al, 2000;Giménez and Govers, 2001). These equations are used as general modelling tools of channel hydraulic characteristics, and some researchers have used them for small ephemeral channels studies during storm flow events (Rendell and Alexander, 1979;Di Stefano et al, 2013).…”
Section: Hydraulic Characterization Of the Gullymentioning
confidence: 99%