Satellites provide information on the temporal and spatial distributions of aerosols on regional and global scales.With the same method applied to a single sensor all over the world, a consistent data set is to be expected. However, the application of different retrieval algorithms to the same sensor, and the use of a series of different sensors may lead to substantial differences and no single sensor or algorithm is better than any others everywhere and at any time. For the production of long-term climate data records, the use of multiple sensors cannot be avoided. The Along Track Scanning 20Radiometer (ATSR-2) and the advanced ATSR (AATSR) Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) data sets have been used to provide a global AOD data record over land and ocean of 17-years (1995-2012), which is planned to be extended with AOD retrieved from a similar sensor, i.e. the Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) which flies on Sentinel-3A launched in early 2016. However, this leaves a gap of about 4 years between the end of the AATSR and the start of the SLSTR data records. To fill this gap, and to investigate the possibility to extend the ATSR data record to earlier years, the 25 use of an AOD data set from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) is investigated. AOD data sets used in this study were retrieved from the ATSR sensors using the ATSR Dual View algorithm ADV v2.31 developed by Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), and from the AVHRR sensors using the ADL algorithm developed by RADI/CAR. Together these data sets cover a multi-decadal period . The study area includes two contrasting areas, both as regards aerosol content and composition and surface properties, i.e. a region over North-East (NE) China encompassing a highly 30 populated urban/industrialized area (Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei) and a sparsely populated mountainous area.Ground-based AOD observations available from ground-based sunphotometer AOD data in AERONET and CARSNET are used as reference, together with radiation-derived showing the qualification of MODIS for comparison with ATSR and AVHRR. The comparison with MODIS shows that AVHRR performs better that ATSR in the north of the study area (40°N), whereas further south ATSR provides better results. The validation versus sunphotometer AOD shows that both AVHRR and ATSR underestimate the AOD, with ATSR failing to provide reliable results in the winter time. This is likely due to the highly reflecting surface in the dry season, when AVHRR-retrieved AOD traces both MODIS and reference AOD data well. However, AVHRR does not provide AOD larger 5 than about 0.6 and hence is not reliable in the summer season when high AOD values have been observed over the last decade. In these cases, ATSR performs much better, for AOD up to about 1.3. AVHRR-retrieved AOD compares favourably with radiance-derived AOD, except for AOD higher than about 0.6. These comparisons lead to the conclusion that AVHRR and ATSR AOD data records each have their strengths and weaknesses which need to be accounted for when co...