Characteristics of cannabis cultivation in New Zealand and Israel

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the characteristics of small-scale cannabis cultivation in New Zealand and Israel. Design/methodology/approach An online survey of predominantly small-scale cannabis cultivators had previously been conducted in 11 countries in 2012/2013. The same core online survey was subsequently conducted in New Zealand and Israel in 2016/2017, and comparisons made with the original 11 countries. Findings Only around one third of the New Zealand and Israeli cannabis growers had sold cannabis, and the majority of these did so only to cover the costs of cultivation. The median number of cannabis plants cultivated per crop by the New Zealand and Israeli growers was five and two, respectively. The leading reasons provided for growing cannabis by both the New Zealand and Israeli growers were to provide cannabis for personal use and to share with others. A higher proportion of New Zealand than Israeli growers reported growing cannabis for medicinal reasons. A total of 16 per cent of the New Zealand and 17 per cent of Israeli growers had come into contact with the police due to their cannabis cultivation. The findings suggest small-scale cannabis cultivation in New Zealand and Israel is largely a means of “social supply” of cannabis, and this is consistent with the findings from the original 11 countries. The higher incidence of growing cannabis for medicinal purposes in New Zealand may reflect the limited official access to medical cannabis. Significant minorities of small-scale cannabis growers in both countries had contact with police, putting them at risk of the negative consequences of a criminal conviction. Originality/value To date, the research into cannabis cultivation has largely consisted of studies of individual countries. However, given the global popularity of cannabis use, and the recent spread of cannabis cultivation to countries that traditionally have not produced cannabis, via utilisation of indoor growing techniques, there is now a strong case for international comparative research. Following the success of the surveys in the original 11 countries, New Zealand and Israeli members of the Global Cannabis Cultivation Research Consortium international collaboration chose to undertake surveys in their own countries in 2016/2017.

The Regulation Backyard: Home Growing Cannabis in Uruguay

“…Motivations for growing are diverse, ranging from ensuring quality and avoiding higher criminal risks, to therapeutic uses, and generating a secondary income. This survey also showed that most small-scale growers were quite inexperienced, having grown five crops or less (Potter et al, 2015; Wilkins et al, 2018).…”

How Can Researchers Support Cannabis Sativa L. Home Growers? Investigating Homegrown C. Sativa Horticulture and Defining Best Practices

“…While research on industrial C. sativa cultivation can be useful for understanding how environmental conditions influence yield outcomes generally, industrial practices may use resources not accessible or efficient to individuals growing at a smaller, homegrown scale (Hammersvik, Sandberg, and Pedersen, 2012). Most research available about home growing habits surrounding C. sativa are collected from qualitative interviews, online surveys (Decorte, 2010a;Barratt et al, 2012;Wilkins et al, 2018;Hakkarainen et al, 2017;Potter et al, 2015;Lenton et al, 2018;Pardal, 2018;Potter, 2006;Decorte, Potter, and Bouchard, 2011), or C. sativa plants seized from illicit growers (Swift et al, 2013;Vanhove et al, 2012;Toonen, Ribot, and Thissen, 2006;Bone and Waldron, 1999). These investigations focus largely on the characteristics of home growers, why citizens grow C. sativa at home, and descriptions on their growing habits or space.…”

The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small-scale cannabis growers

“…Full discussion of the sample characteristics and the general findings of the survey can be found in Potter et al (2015) and Wilkins et al (2018). Given the focus of our study (domestic small-scale cannabis cultivation) and the method (an online survey), we expected (and acknowledged) a bias toward smaller scale growers who are less involved in drug markets and other types of crime.…”