“…CO 2 consumption rates by carbonate and silicate weathering are from 17.9 to 530 × 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 (averaging at 206 × 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 ) and from 167 to 460 × 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 (averaging at 281×10 3 mol km −2 a −1 ) for major river catchments in the SECRB. The CO 2 consumption rates by silicate weathering in the SECRB are higher than that of major rivers in the world and China, such as the Amazon (174 × 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Mortatti and Probst, 2003), the Mississippi and the Mackenzie (66.8 and 34.1 × 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Gaillardet et al, 1999), the Changjiang (112×10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Chetelat et al, 2008), the Huanghe (35×10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Fan et al, 2014), the Xijiang (154× 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Xu and Liu, 2010), the Longchuanjiang (173×10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Li et al, 2011), the Mekong (191× 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Li et al, 2014), three large rivers in eastern Tibet (103-121 × 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Noh et al, 2009), the Hanjiang in central China (120 × 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Li et al, 2009) and the Sonhuajiang in northeastern China (66.6 × 10 3 mol km −2 a −1 , Liu et al, 2013). The high CO 2 consumption rates by silicate weathering in the SECRB could be attributed to extensive distribution of silicate rocks, high runoff and favorable climatic conditions.…”