2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2008.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of cross-flow rotating packed beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the RPB increased the area of contact between gas and liquid and reduced the total resistance to mass transfer, considerably reducing the size of the equipment and the capital and operating costs [10]. The RPB has been extensively utilized for distillation [11][12][13], VOCs absorption [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], CO 2 absorption [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], O 3 absorption [30][31][32], ozonation [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], reactive precipitation [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], and stripping [53,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the RPB increased the area of contact between gas and liquid and reduced the total resistance to mass transfer, considerably reducing the size of the equipment and the capital and operating costs [10]. The RPB has been extensively utilized for distillation [11][12][13], VOCs absorption [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], CO 2 absorption [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], O 3 absorption [30][31][32], ozonation [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], reactive precipitation [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], and stripping [53,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPB can provide a mean acceleration of up to 1,000 times greater than the force of gravity, thereby leading to the formation of thin liquid films and micro-or nano-droplets. (Chen et al, 2004, Chen et al, 2010, Cheng and Tan, 2011, Kelleher and Fair, 1996, Lin and Chen, 2008, Yu et al, 2012. Both the CO 2 removal efficiency and carbonation conversion of steelmaking slag in an RPB were observed to be greater than those in an autoclave or a slurry reactor (Chang et al, 2012b;Pan et al, 2013a, b).…”
Section: Combination With Novel Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass transfer is 10-100 times greater than achieved in the conventional packed bed, so the required equipment is physically smaller than that required for the conventional packed bed, so the capital and operating costs are lower [19]. The RPB has been extensively used for gas-liquid processes such as distillation [20], VOC absorption [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], CO 2 absorption [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], O 3 absorption [41][42][43], ozonation [44], and stripping [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%