2002
DOI: 10.1309/5rkt-pt2d-93pf-dvek
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Educational Software Use in 106 Clinical Laboratories

Abstract: The University of Washington, Seattle, has developed educational software for clinical laboratories. We used a 32-question survey to study software implementation. Of 106 clinical laboratories (response rate, 60%) that purchased the software and completed the survey, 89 laboratories (84%) that reported using the software formed the basis for the study. The most common software users were laboratory personnel, followed by medical technologist or medical laboratory technician students, residents, and medical stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Kataoka & Sugiura, 2005) Many different computer programs, which support interpretation of laboratory test results (e. g. blood grouping) (Growe et al, 1996), alert systems (Kuperman et al, 1998;Lo et al, 2007;Lo et al, 2009), quality control (Tan et al, 1990) and physician's order entry systems (Mekhjian et al, 2002) are already in use. These programs facilitate working with massive amount of patient's data, comparing kinetics of different analyses as well evaluating their progress during time course (Astion et al, 2002). Using such programs, management of data by breakdown of computer network must be considered in advance (Zeiler et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Kataoka & Sugiura, 2005) Many different computer programs, which support interpretation of laboratory test results (e. g. blood grouping) (Growe et al, 1996), alert systems (Kuperman et al, 1998;Lo et al, 2007;Lo et al, 2009), quality control (Tan et al, 1990) and physician's order entry systems (Mekhjian et al, 2002) are already in use. These programs facilitate working with massive amount of patient's data, comparing kinetics of different analyses as well evaluating their progress during time course (Astion et al, 2002). Using such programs, management of data by breakdown of computer network must be considered in advance (Zeiler et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work from our group at the University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine has focused on computer-based methods of developing, maintaining, and assessing competency of laboratory personnel [For a recent review, see Ref. (2 )]. This effort started in 1992 and for the first 8 years consisted of development of tutorial or competency assessment software and software distribution on floppy or compact disks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some programs use problem-based learning methods; others include computer-assisted and interactive learning and also Web-based clinical scenarios simulating real-life examples. [4][5][6][7][8] This study was undertaken in an attempt to establish a consensus among medical schools in this regard in North America, using a simple questionnaire-type survey.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%