1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1988.tb01575.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of female adolescent sexual offenders.

Abstract: Descriptive data on a group of female adolescent sexual offenders seen in an outpatient clinic are presented, with characteristics of offenders, offenses, and victims. Unlike female adult sexual offenders of previous studies, these adolescents committed offenses without coercion from male co-offenders starting at an early age. Results are discussed with reference to gender differences among adolescent sexual offenders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(6 reference statements)
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of this attention has focused on juvenile male offenders as they appear to account for proportionally more acts of sexual perpetration against children than females, and as there appear to be clear parallels in the etiology and clinical manifestation of adult and juvenile male sexual offending (Davis & Leitenberg, 1987). However, recent data indicate that a number of male victims identify a female perpetrator (Johnson & Shrier, 1985), and that female sexual offending, like male perpetration, has a counterpart in childhood and adolescence (Fehrenbach & Monastersky, 1988). In contrast to a growing literature describing the developmental and clinical characteristics of juvenile male sexual offenders, relatively little has been published about juvenile females who sexually molest children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of this attention has focused on juvenile male offenders as they appear to account for proportionally more acts of sexual perpetration against children than females, and as there appear to be clear parallels in the etiology and clinical manifestation of adult and juvenile male sexual offending (Davis & Leitenberg, 1987). However, recent data indicate that a number of male victims identify a female perpetrator (Johnson & Shrier, 1985), and that female sexual offending, like male perpetration, has a counterpart in childhood and adolescence (Fehrenbach & Monastersky, 1988). In contrast to a growing literature describing the developmental and clinical characteristics of juvenile male sexual offenders, relatively little has been published about juvenile females who sexually molest children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although juvenile females appear to molest children of both sexes (Knopp & Lackey, 1987), it has been suggested that their patterns of perpetration are not of a repetitive nature and that they are not as prone toward the presence of non-sexual conduct prob-lems as juvenile male perpetrators (Fehrenbach & Monastersky, 1988). Relatively little is known about the role of fantasy in juvenile female perpetration, and whether youthful females, like their male counterparts, have deviant sexual arousal and interest patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the present study, juveniles exclusively convicted of porn distribution or the possession of illegal pornography were excluded from further analyses (n = 119; 28.4%). Although differences between 8 male and female JSO seem likely (Fehrenbach & Monastersky, 1988), female JSO had to be excluded because the number of females (n = 9, 2.1%) was too small for statistical analyses. From the remaining 251 subjects, 28 (11.2%) files were not available, mostly due to official elimination of archive files (n = 22, 8.8% …”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there is little information about perpetration of sexual violence by adolescent females, either in terms of associated risk factors or actual incidence. [15][16][17] Self-report of sexual aggression has been recommended as the best approach for estimating rates of adolescent sexual perpetration. 6 In this study, we compare a nonclinical population of male and female adolescents who report a history of forcing someone into a sexual act with adolescents who have never forced someone into a sexual act.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%