2011
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.1585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Gas Hydrate Stability Zone in The Muli Permafrost, Qinghai: Results Compared Between Modeling and Drilling

Abstract: Based on gas composition and temperature measurements in the course of field drilling, the upper and lower depths of gas hydrate stability zone are calculated by modeling in the Muli permafrost, Qinghai, then the modeling results are compared with the drilling results. The modeling results show that the upper depth of gas hydrate stability zone is 148.8~122.7 m and the lower depth of gas hydrate stability zone is 324.6~354.8 m, with the thickness of gas hydrate stability zone of 175.8~232.2 m; the drilling res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that the top and bottom depth of the hydrate stability zone calculated by data of real gas composition and temperature of drilling mud are comparable with the yield depth of hydrate and its anomalies revealed by drilling. The top depth and bottom depth of the hydrate stability zone by modeling are respectively 148.8 m to 122.7 m and 324.6 m to 354.8 m and the thickness of gas hydrate bearing sediments is 175.8 m to 232.2 m. The interval of hydrate and its anomalies revealed by drilling is 133 m to 396 m [33] . These two results are basically same, which proves that the empirical model is applicable.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It shows that the top and bottom depth of the hydrate stability zone calculated by data of real gas composition and temperature of drilling mud are comparable with the yield depth of hydrate and its anomalies revealed by drilling. The top depth and bottom depth of the hydrate stability zone by modeling are respectively 148.8 m to 122.7 m and 324.6 m to 354.8 m and the thickness of gas hydrate bearing sediments is 175.8 m to 232.2 m. The interval of hydrate and its anomalies revealed by drilling is 133 m to 396 m [33] . These two results are basically same, which proves that the empirical model is applicable.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The part with the steeper slope denotes a lower geothermal gradient, while the other part of the curve that is less steep represents the strata beneath the frozen soil. This means that the geothermal gradient is higher in the underlaying strata compared to that in the frozen soil. , The inflection point where these two sections of the curve connect represents the bottom depth of the frozen soil, where the formation temperature is 0 °C. The thickness of the frozen soil determines the vertical extension of the formation temperature curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there has been a marked acceleration of studies in evaluating the technical and economic feasibility of gas production from natural hydrate accumulations. As early as in 1967, the former Soviet for the first time discovered its permafrost gas hydrate in the course of developing the Messoyakha gas field in the western Siberian. , In 1972, the researchers in Northwest Eileen State-02 (NWE-2) well on the Alaska North Slope confirmed the presence of gas hydrate in the permafrost region . In 1998, the Japanese cooperated with Canada and discovered 37 m depth of hydrate cores when drilling 890–952 m in the Mackenzie delta in Canada .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%