2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107819
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of ground surface temperature at Chalaping in the Source Area of the Yellow River, northeastern Tibetan Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, although using ground surface temperature as upper boundary conditions can reduce the need of calculating surface energy balance budget, those data may not be widely available at the regional scale. The remotely sensed land surface temperature can be used as a substitute, but the difference between ground surface temperature and land surface temperature can be large due to the buffering effects of surface vegetation or snow cover (Luo et al, 2018;Luo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Current Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, although using ground surface temperature as upper boundary conditions can reduce the need of calculating surface energy balance budget, those data may not be widely available at the regional scale. The remotely sensed land surface temperature can be used as a substitute, but the difference between ground surface temperature and land surface temperature can be large due to the buffering effects of surface vegetation or snow cover (Luo et al, 2018;Luo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Current Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study area is located in the transitional zone of seasonally frozen ground and sporadic, discontinuous permafrost at the northeast boundary of the permafrost region of the QTP (Jin et al, 2009; Luo, Jin, Wu, et al, 2018). The vegetation is dwarfed and herbaceous and dominated by paludal and typical alpine meadows and steppes (Jin et al, 2009; Luo et al, 2014; Luo et al, 2020). The distribution of frozen ground is more complex, and its vertical distribution is diverse.…”
Section: Study Area and Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we calculated the fractional vegetation cover (FVC) with the MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and then assigned the N-factors to each grid point in consideration of the FVC. In this study, we first reclassified the NDVI into five classes (0-0.2, 0.2-0.4, 0.4-0.6, 0.6-0.8, and 0.8-1.0), and then assigned the thawing N-factors of 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9, as well as freezing N-factors of 1.5, 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, and 0.8, to each grid point in consideration of vegetation differences, as the freezing and thawing N-factors for the surface characteristics on the TP are generally within 0.5-0.8 and 0.9-1.5, respectively [72,75,77]. The FVC is computed as follows:…”
Section: Surface Vegetation and The N-factorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Here, FI L and TI L are the freezing and thawing indices derived from LST products, respectively; T s is the nominal daily LST; T f is the freezing point (usually defined as 0 • C); and T is the average daily LST. As a result of the complex influence of surface characteristics, the mean annual ground surface temperature varies greatly even in the same geographical unit with consistent elevation and similar vegetation [72]. The insulating effects of snow cover in the winter and vegetation cover in the summer cause a large temperature deviation between ground surface temperature and the near-surface or land surface temperatures.…”
Section: Data 231 Modis Lstmentioning
confidence: 99%