1995
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1995)121:4(276)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data presented above clearly illustrate the ineffectiveness of using sieving as a treatment option for soils similar to SCC soils. A similar conclusion was drawn by Yarlagadda et al 15 using some Resource Conservation and Recovery Act-designated soils. In addition, this is an important conclusion if one wished to model the resuspended soil emissions for air quality, since the source term can be easily identified by measuring the general concentration of metals in the soils without size-segregating to determine the concentration of the potential airborne fraction.…”
Section: Selected Sites At a Depth Of 30-38 CMsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The data presented above clearly illustrate the ineffectiveness of using sieving as a treatment option for soils similar to SCC soils. A similar conclusion was drawn by Yarlagadda et al 15 using some Resource Conservation and Recovery Act-designated soils. In addition, this is an important conclusion if one wished to model the resuspended soil emissions for air quality, since the source term can be easily identified by measuring the general concentration of metals in the soils without size-segregating to determine the concentration of the potential airborne fraction.…”
Section: Selected Sites At a Depth Of 30-38 CMsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Solid waste disposals (open dumps, landfills, sanitary landfills or incinerators) represent a significant source of metals released into the environment (Yarlagadda et al 1995;Waheed et al 2010;Iwegbue et al 2010;Bretzel and Calderisi 2011;Rizo et al 2012). Leachate is produced primarily in association with precipitation that infiltrates through the refuse and normally results in the migration of leachate into the groundwater zone and pollutes it (Samuding 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[7][8][9][10][11][12] One of the key issues addressed while developing the technology of decontamination of soils, sediments, and aquifer materials using a soil-washing reactor is related to the study of interactions of hydrophobic pollutants at the solid-water interface. 13,14 More likely than not, the physicochemical interactions, including sorption, desorption, and volatilization, are of utmost importance in deciding the ultimate fate process of the pollutant in an aquatic environment. Several investigators have worked to enhance the understanding of physicochemical interactions of hazardous pollutants at the aquatic interface of soil/ clay/sediment/aquifer, because it is long recognized that this understanding is focal to the success of soil-washing technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have worked to enhance the understanding of physicochemical interactions of hazardous pollutants at the aquatic interface of soil/ clay/sediment/aquifer, because it is long recognized that this understanding is focal to the success of soil-washing technology. For example, specific studies have been carried out for washing soils/sediments contaminated with organics 2,4,15 and inorganics 1,8,9,13,16 and also modeling the sorption and desorption phenomenon. 17 Many isolated research efforts on development and application of quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs) for predicting the sorption and desorption equilibrium at the activated carbon/water interface or activated carbon/air interface [18][19][20][21][22] have been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%