2005
DOI: 10.1080/02699050500309460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of home-based community integration programmes for adults with brain injury

Abstract: There is considerable variability in characteristics among home-based community integration programmes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches recognise the complex, multi-dimensional nature of brain injury and the need for custom-built solutions for successful community integration. Glenn et al (2005) in a telephone survey of 13 home-based programs for community integration, underlined the high degree of variability they encountered among both participant and program characteristics. Unfortunately, highly individualised program are considerably more expensive programs to plan and offer than larger programs that can realise some economies of scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These approaches recognise the complex, multi-dimensional nature of brain injury and the need for custom-built solutions for successful community integration. Glenn et al (2005) in a telephone survey of 13 home-based programs for community integration, underlined the high degree of variability they encountered among both participant and program characteristics. Unfortunately, highly individualised program are considerably more expensive programs to plan and offer than larger programs that can realise some economies of scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Teasell, Bayona, Marshall, Cullen, Bayley et al (2007), only about 28% of the literature on rehabilitation for ABI consists of randomised trials. Because of the complexity of community-based research and the diverse nature of both programs and population in brain injury, these methodologies tend not to be terribly productive (Glenn, Selleck, Goldstein, & Rotman, 2005;Ragnarsson, 2006;Teasell et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, despite the documented benefits of community reintegration residential programming for persons with ABI (Willer et al, 1999), variability across these settings makes relative effectiveness difficult to quantify (Glenn, Rotman, et al, 2005; Glenn, Selleck, et al, 2005; Trudel et al, 2007). The characteristics of home-based programs also vary and thus are difficult to assess (Trudel et al, 2007).…”
Section: Community Reintegrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brief education (i.e., isolated sessions) has not been particularly effective in addressing support needs of network members and survivors (Ylvisaker et al, 2005). In contrast, comprehensive programs addressing survivors and support networks have resulted in positive outcomes including increased independent living for survivors and decreased cost for caring for survivors during the first year of community integration (Feeney, Ylvisaker, Rosen, & Greene, 2001;Glenn, Selleck, Goldstein, & Rotman, 2005).…”
Section: Shift In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%