2021
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of in situ stress and its influence on coal seam permeability in the Liupanshui Coalfield, Western Guizhou

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seepage pressure was always less than the confining pressure to prevent water from flowing out between the heat‐shrinkable tube and the specimen. These test conditions were selected because, according to the actual in situ stress conditions and empirical formula in the study area, the horizontal in situ stress is approximately 10–20 MPa, and the seepage pressure is approximately 3 MPa within the depth range of the sample used in the test 35–37 . Different confining pressures and seepage pressures were selected to simulate different depth effects, and enough test data were obtained to understand the permeability evolution process of sandstone under different confining and seepage pressures.…”
Section: Equipment and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seepage pressure was always less than the confining pressure to prevent water from flowing out between the heat‐shrinkable tube and the specimen. These test conditions were selected because, according to the actual in situ stress conditions and empirical formula in the study area, the horizontal in situ stress is approximately 10–20 MPa, and the seepage pressure is approximately 3 MPa within the depth range of the sample used in the test 35–37 . Different confining pressures and seepage pressures were selected to simulate different depth effects, and enough test data were obtained to understand the permeability evolution process of sandstone under different confining and seepage pressures.…”
Section: Equipment and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This depth is also consistent with that of the high-low-permeability transition zone studied by predecessors in eastern Yunnan and western Guizhou (Figure 4B). 15,41,42 For combinedlayer drainage, the interval between layers is a factor that cannot be ignored. The layer spacing should be controlled within a certain range, and for the Laochang mining area, the maximum layer spacing should be controlled within 80 m (Figure 4C).…”
Section: Influence Of Geological Factors On the Productivity Of Cbm W...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 The stress regimes of shallow strike-slip and deep normal fault types were revealed. [13][14][15] Coal structure is affected by coal thickness, in situ stress, geological structure, and coal mine goaf; furthermore, the homogeneity of primary structural coal is better than tectonic coal. 16,17 The development degree of coal-seam fractures has significant anisotropy in both horizontal and vertical directions, which is related to the complex tectonic stress in this area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coal seam permeability is one of the most important bases for evaluating the degree of CBM development and the effect of mine gas drainage, , but its measurement and evaluation are very difficult . Scholars have carried out many studies on the influencing factors and prediction of coal permeability. In situ stress, , gas pressure and type, , and the anisotropic characteristics of coal reservoirs , determine the permeability of coal to varying degrees, and there are relevant coal permeability evaluation models , to theoretically discuss the mechanism of its seepage law. However, most of the above coal permeability acquisition and evaluation methods are still in the laboratory measurement stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%