2020
DOI: 10.1190/geo2019-0776.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of microseismic data recorded by distributed acoustic sensing systems in anisotropic media

Abstract: Fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) cables are now used to monitor microseismicity during hydraulic-fracture stimulations of unconventional gas reservoirs. Unlike geophone arrays, DAS systems are sensitive to uniaxial strain or strain rate along the fiber direction and thus provide a 1C recording, which makes identifying the directionality and polarization of incoming waves difficult. Using synthetic examples, we have shown some fundamental characteristics of microseismic recordings on DAS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They simultaneously utilize spatiotemporal patterns across hundreds or thousands of channels and can thus overcome the lower SNR of individual channels. DAS can also be used for focal mechanism [99,111] and magnitude [14,105] estimation. For both, the directional measurement of DAS poses a significant challenge, as not all components of the seismic wavefield excited by the source can be recorded.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They simultaneously utilize spatiotemporal patterns across hundreds or thousands of channels and can thus overcome the lower SNR of individual channels. DAS can also be used for focal mechanism [99,111] and magnitude [14,105] estimation. For both, the directional measurement of DAS poses a significant challenge, as not all components of the seismic wavefield excited by the source can be recorded.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the most widespread microseismic analysis methods, based on identifying distinct seismic phases at each receiver, underperform when applied to DAS data. Finally, microseismic information is most valuable in near-real-time [ 99 ]. The amount of data generated by DAS imposes significant computational difficulties to the timely delivery of results.…”
Section: Seismic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DAS data provides only a single-component recording (the fiber is sensitive to changes in strain along the fiber, but insensitive to changes broadside to the cable) whereas standard geophones and seismometers can provide three-component recordings. Nevertheless, processing techniques are advancing to determine microseismic event locations (Webster et al, 2016;Verdon et al, 2020) and source mechanisms (Cole et al, 2018;Baird et al, 2020) from DAS data. The technology is also being explored for microseismic monitoring in other industrial settings, for example at geothermal sites (Mondanos and Coleman, 2019), geological CO 2 storage sites and for volcano monitoring.…”
Section: Das For Microseismic Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then convert particle velocity along the cable direction to DAS strain-rate by differencing over the gauge length and dividing by gauge length (Miller et al, 2016). For further details on the synthetic data modeling see Baird et al (2020).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation