1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82186-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of midsized urban EMS systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,11,12 The ability of dispatchers to identify patients in cardiac arrest and provide CPR instructions over the phone is well documented, 7,19 and priority dispatch concepts have also been expanded to include discrimination between BLS and ALS situations. 7,[10][11][12][13][14][15]25 Earlier research efforts from this institution and others have demonstrated that a computer-aided priority dispatch algorithm can safely and reliably help dispatchers distinguish between ALS and BLS incidents. 7,10,14,15,20,25 Such systems can be of value, particularly in busy urban EMS systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7,11,12 The ability of dispatchers to identify patients in cardiac arrest and provide CPR instructions over the phone is well documented, 7,19 and priority dispatch concepts have also been expanded to include discrimination between BLS and ALS situations. 7,[10][11][12][13][14][15]25 Earlier research efforts from this institution and others have demonstrated that a computer-aided priority dispatch algorithm can safely and reliably help dispatchers distinguish between ALS and BLS incidents. 7,10,14,15,20,25 Such systems can be of value, particularly in busy urban EMS systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,10 Recognizing that only a small percentage of calls ever utilize advanced life support (ALS) skills, modern priority dispatch systems have been developed that either triage the need for a rapid, ''lights and siren'' response (which may pose some additional traffic risk) or, in other cases, simply limit paramedic deployment to those emergencies that probably will require advanced skills. 7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] By sending nonparamedic ambulances staffed by BLS-providing emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to the lower-priority calls, EMS systems can function with fewer paramedics. 1,6,7,22 With fewer paramedics, each paramedic gains more experience with those true emergency situations for which he or she needs to be focused, thereby improving his or her clinical performance in these situations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that, on average, each ambulance serves about 123,000 people and each base must cover an average of 155 km 2 . This contrasts, for instance, with the US, where by the 1990s there was about 1 ambulance per 51,000 inhabitants (Braun et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This means that, on average, each ambulance serves about 123,000 people and each base must cover an average of 155 km 2 . This contrasts, for instance, with the US, where by the 1990s there was about 1 ambulance per 51,000 inhabitants (Braun et al, 1990). This work is motivated by the lack of resources and their sub-optimal use, which is evident when we consider that the average response time of RCT ambulances was approximately 14 min with an SD of 7 min.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%