2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of prospectively identified negative alcohol-related events among college students

Abstract: The high peer involvement at all stages of the event suggest the potential for training college students to help each other avoid or prevent consequences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building upon the lower levels of the pyramid of needs, the individuals were then able to deploy personal resources to work on their inner needs of respect, self-esteem, and recognition. The increase in self-regulation and self-efficacy was related to remaining abstinent [ 66 , 75 ], most likely because the perception of behavioral control was enhanced in a feedback cycle that further promoted the motivation to sustain recovery. In this sense, the meaning of sustained recovery included general aspects of wellbeing and was holistic, bringing it closer to the definition agreed upon by the Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel [ 12 ] and the process defined by the UK Drug Policy Commission [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon the lower levels of the pyramid of needs, the individuals were then able to deploy personal resources to work on their inner needs of respect, self-esteem, and recognition. The increase in self-regulation and self-efficacy was related to remaining abstinent [ 66 , 75 ], most likely because the perception of behavioral control was enhanced in a feedback cycle that further promoted the motivation to sustain recovery. In this sense, the meaning of sustained recovery included general aspects of wellbeing and was holistic, bringing it closer to the definition agreed upon by the Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel [ 12 ] and the process defined by the UK Drug Policy Commission [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%