Vaccination against Brucella infections in animals is usually performed by administration of live attenuated smooth B. abortus strain S19 and B. melitensis strain Rev1. They are proven effective vaccines against B. abortus in cattle and against B. melitensis and B. ovis in sheep and goats, respectively. However, both vaccines have the main drawback of inducing O-polysaccharide-specific antibodies that interfere with serologic diagnosis of disease. In addition, they retain residual virulence, being a cause of abortion in pregnant animals and infection in humans. To overcome these problems, one approach is to develop defined rough mutant Brucella strains lacking O antigen of lipopolysaccharide. B. abortus rough strain RB51, a rifampin-resistant mutant of virulent strain B. abortus 2308, is used as a vaccine against B. abortus infection in cattle in some countries. However, RB51 is not effective in sheep, and there is only preliminary evidence that it is effective in goats. In this study, we tested the efficacies of six rifampin-resistant rough strains of B. melitensis in protecting BALB/c mice exposed to B. melitensis infection. The protective properties, as well as both humoral and cellular immune responses, were assessed in comparison with those provided by B. melitensis Rev1 and B. abortus RB51 vaccines. The results indicated that these rough mutants were able to induce a very good level of protection against B. melitensis infection, similar to that provided by Rev1 and superior to that of RB51, without inducing antibodies to O antigen. In addition, all B. melitensis mutants were able to stimulate good production of gamma interferon. The characteristics of these strains encourage further evaluation of them as alternative vaccines to Rev1 in primary host species.Brucellosis is a major zoonotic disease, widely distributed in humans and domestic and wild animals, especially in developing countries. Among the different species of the Brucella genus, B. abortus and B. melitensis are the most pathogenic and virulent, not only for cattle or for sheep and goats, respectively, but also for other animal species. The occurrence of the disease in humans is largely dependent on the animal reservoir, with the highest rate of human infection in areas where rates of brucellosis in sheep and goats are high (6,35).Brucellosis vaccines are essential elements in control programs. Attenuated B. abortus strain 19 and B. melitensis strain Rev1 are proven effective vaccines; they induce good levels of protection against B. abortus in cattle and against B. melitensis in sheep and goats, preventing premature abortions (7, 30, 31). However, both vaccines have the drawback of inducing Opolysaccharide-specific antibodies that interfere with the discrimination between vaccinated and infected animals during serological screening (7, 31). In addition, they retain pathogenicity and sometimes cause abortion in vaccinated animals (10, 18, 41) and remain infectious for humans (3,5,26). The use of the conjunctival route when administering B. melit...