2020
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2020.557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of rural domestic wastewater with source separation

Abstract: Rural domestic wastewater (RDW), one of the non-point pollution sources, has become a significant object related to sanitation improvement and water pollution control in Taihu Lake Basin, China. Current research on RDW characteristics and management with source separation is limited. In this study, a source-separated investigation into the characteristics of RDW was conducted, and the management suggestions were proposed. The results showed that the average RDW production coefficient was 94.1 ± 31.6 (range: 71… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies reported reduction in dissolved oxygen (DO) levels during the filtration process (Xu et al 2020;Singh et al 2021). Sufficient availability of oxygen to the aerobic heterotrophic bacteria promotes the removal of organic content by aerobic oxidation (Abed et al 2017;Cheng et al 2021). About 50% of influent BOD and COD removals occurred in the top 10 cm depth of the filter media while the remaining depth contributed additional removals (Katukiza et al 2014a).…”
Section: Media Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies reported reduction in dissolved oxygen (DO) levels during the filtration process (Xu et al 2020;Singh et al 2021). Sufficient availability of oxygen to the aerobic heterotrophic bacteria promotes the removal of organic content by aerobic oxidation (Abed et al 2017;Cheng et al 2021). About 50% of influent BOD and COD removals occurred in the top 10 cm depth of the filter media while the remaining depth contributed additional removals (Katukiza et al 2014a).…”
Section: Media Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It accounts for about 75% of the domestic wastewater, although it could be up to 100% if dry latrines are used [ 26 , 27 ]. Blackwater—toilet water—represents a smaller fraction of the domestic wastewater and has higher nutrient content than COD-rich greywater [ 28 ]. Because of that, it can be beneficial to separate them at the source, leading not only to greywater reuse but also to possible blackwater and kitchen waste combined disposal [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understandably, those features of WW are entirely dissimilar, with a relatively concentrated drainage period and more fluctuant drainage frequency and amount . In addition, several major feature indicators of TW and WW such as COD, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), TN, pH, and emissions ranged between 660–1160 and 176–323 mg/L, 150–318 and 3–14 mg/L, 214–410 and 7–16 mg/L, 8.30–9.00 and 6.60–7.50, and 25–40 and 70–150 L/capita/day, respectively. Based on the above analysis, it can be found that the features of these two kinds of wastewater are totally different. In addition, as a disadvantage of onsite treatment technology, the shock of wastewater quality and quantity originates from TW and WW, respectively, and coping with these two types of shocks separately may be a high-efficiency method for raising the cost-performance of conventional onsite technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%