Characteristics of smartphone-based dietary assessment tools: a systematic review

Abstract

Smartphones have become popular in assessing eating behaviour in real-life and realtime. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of smartphone-based dietary assessment tools, focusing on how dietary data is assessed and its completeness ensured.Seven databases from behavioural, social and computer science were searched in March 2020.All observational, experimental or intervention studies and study protocols using a smartphone-based assessment tool for dietary intake were included if they reported data collected by adults and were published in English. Out of 21,722 records initially screened, 117 publications using 129 tools were included. Five core assessment features were identified: photo-based assessment (48.8% of tools), assessed serving/ portion sizes (48.8%), free-text descriptions of food intake (42.6%), food databases (30.2%), and classification systems (27.9%). On average, a tool used two features. The majority of studies did not implement any features to improve completeness of the records. This review provides a comprehensive overview and framework of smartphone-based dietary assessment tools to help researchers identify suitable assessment tools for their studies. Future research needs to address the potential impact of specific dietary assessment methods on data quality and participants' willingness to record their behaviour to ultimately improve the quality of smartphone-based dietary assessment for health research.

Do nutrition knowledge, food preferences, and habit strength moderate the association between preference for intuition and deliberation in eating decision‐making and dietary intake?

“…Finally, the study lacks external validity because it was cross‐sectional and exclusively relied on questionnaires, also for assessing behavior, which have several shortcomings including recall bias (Naska et al, 2017; Thompson & Subar, 2017) that may distort the findings. A more in‐depth recording of eating behavior, for example, using smartphone‐based Ecological Momentary Assessment (König, Van Emmenis, et al, 2021; Shiffman et al, 2008), is needed to confirm the findings in real‐life settings.…”

A theory-based video intervention to enhance communication and engagement in online health communities: two experiments

“…Importantly, self-report is the most feasible method in online studies. Nevertheless, future studies could consider new assessment methods such as photo-based recording (König, Van Emmenis, Nurmi, Kassavou, & Sutton, 2021 ) that may increase usability and reduce participant burden. Importantly, while absolute levels of target behaviors may be biased in our study, the goal attainment scores are informative, because both scores were measured with the same method within the same person, resulting in the same bias (e.g.…”

Are commonly used lab‐based measures of food value and choice predictive of self‐reported real‐world snacking? An ecological momentary assessment study

“…Although only the free text recall was compulsory, previous work has demonstrated that the use of images in dietary assessments supports participant recall and increases reporting accuracy (Zhao et al, 2021 ). The use of food images and free text recall also supported the research team in the extraction of accurate nutritional information for specific products, and identification of portion sizes (where this information was not provided by participants) (see König et al, 2021 ). A combined time (free text recall) and event (image upload)‐based approach increases the accuracy and ecological validity of EMA assessments, as limitations associated with solely event‐based approaches (i.e.…”