2008
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2008.80032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of Solid-state Fermented Feed and its Effects on Performance and Nutrient Digestibility in Growing-finishing Pigs

Abstract: This study investigated the effects of solid-state fermentation of a compound pig feed on its microbial and nutritional characteristics as well as on pig performance and nutrient digestibility. A mixed culture containing Lactobacillus fermentum, Saccharomyces cerevisae and Bacillus subtilis was used for solid-state fermentation and solid-state fermented feed samples were collected on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 and 30 for microbial counts and chemical analysis. Lactic acid bacteria increased rapidly duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of enzymes and other secondary metabohtes in the probiotic products and the endogenous production of enzymes by probiotic microbes might explain the improved ATTD of nutrients in pigs from probiotic treatments. In a previous experiment, Hu et al (2008) had employed SSF technology for fermenting compound feed using mixed culture (I/, fermentum, S. cerevisae, and B. suhtilis) and had observed increased lactic acid bacteria and concentration of acetic acid and decreased pH and enterobacteria count in SSF feed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The presence of enzymes and other secondary metabohtes in the probiotic products and the endogenous production of enzymes by probiotic microbes might explain the improved ATTD of nutrients in pigs from probiotic treatments. In a previous experiment, Hu et al (2008) had employed SSF technology for fermenting compound feed using mixed culture (I/, fermentum, S. cerevisae, and B. suhtilis) and had observed increased lactic acid bacteria and concentration of acetic acid and decreased pH and enterobacteria count in SSF feed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To date, many researchers have mimicked both aseptic and nonaseptic conditions of an SSF process with or without microbial inoculants to ferment various feed materials for increasing the DL-lactic acid content (9,10) and lactic acid bacteria counts (3,(7)(8)(9)(11)(12)(13), for the elimination of antinutritional factors (7,14), for the fortification of major nutrients and enzymes (7,8,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), and for the destruction of grain viscous constituents (6). Successful fermentation depends on the control of many factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no significant difference in the feed efficiency of FWW and FWB treatments in the total growth period, compared with the CON treatment. Diets supplemented with 15% solid-state fermented feed had no difference in growth performance compared with pigs fed diets supplemented with antibiotics in growing-finishing figs (Hu et al, 2008). Missotten et al (2010) reported that the feed efficiency was improved when growing-finishing pigs were fed fermented liquid diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%