Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BackgroundEffective alcohol and other drugs (AODs) treatment has been proven to increase productivity and reduce costs to the community. Telehealth has previously been proven effective at delivering AOD treatment in the right settings. Yet, Australia's current Medicare funding restricts telephone consultations.AimWe hypothesise that treatment modality influences attendance rates. Specifically, telephone consultations can remove barriers to accessing treatment and, therefore, can increase attendance.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective audit on our addiction medicine specialist outpatient service from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023. A mixed‐effects logistic regression model was used to analyse factors associated with attendance rates.ResultsThere were 576 participants in the study, and 3354 appointments were booked over the 12‐month study period. Of these, 2695 were face‐to‐face, 541 were telephone and 118 were video. The unadjusted raw attendance rate was highest in the telephone group (87.24%), followed by face‐to‐face (73.02%) and video (44.92%). After adjusting for covariates, telephone consultation was associated with significantly increased odds of attending compared to face‐to‐face (odds ratio (OR) = 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.90–3.54, P < 0.001). Video consultation was associated with a 69% reduction in the odds of attending compared to face‐to‐face (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.019–0.49, P < 0.001).ConclusionsWhile physical attendance may be required for specific clinical care, telephone consultations are associated with increased attendance and can form an important adjunct to delivering addiction treatment. Given the substantial costs of substance use disorders, this could inform government policies and funding priorities to further improve access and treatment outcomes.
BackgroundEffective alcohol and other drugs (AODs) treatment has been proven to increase productivity and reduce costs to the community. Telehealth has previously been proven effective at delivering AOD treatment in the right settings. Yet, Australia's current Medicare funding restricts telephone consultations.AimWe hypothesise that treatment modality influences attendance rates. Specifically, telephone consultations can remove barriers to accessing treatment and, therefore, can increase attendance.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective audit on our addiction medicine specialist outpatient service from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023. A mixed‐effects logistic regression model was used to analyse factors associated with attendance rates.ResultsThere were 576 participants in the study, and 3354 appointments were booked over the 12‐month study period. Of these, 2695 were face‐to‐face, 541 were telephone and 118 were video. The unadjusted raw attendance rate was highest in the telephone group (87.24%), followed by face‐to‐face (73.02%) and video (44.92%). After adjusting for covariates, telephone consultation was associated with significantly increased odds of attending compared to face‐to‐face (odds ratio (OR) = 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.90–3.54, P < 0.001). Video consultation was associated with a 69% reduction in the odds of attending compared to face‐to‐face (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.019–0.49, P < 0.001).ConclusionsWhile physical attendance may be required for specific clinical care, telephone consultations are associated with increased attendance and can form an important adjunct to delivering addiction treatment. Given the substantial costs of substance use disorders, this could inform government policies and funding priorities to further improve access and treatment outcomes.
Background/Objectives: Chronic migraine (CM) is a neurological disorder that causes significant disability, loss of productivity, and economic burden. Preventive treatments, including pharmacological and educational interventions, are crucial for managing CM effectively. The aim of this study was to analyze whether adding a therapeutic telehealth education program (TTEP) to pharmacological treatment achieved a greater reduction in the number of headache days experienced by patients with CM. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study with two parallel groups was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of CM and who were being treated with Botulinum Toxin were randomly assigned to either the EG (therapeutic education program about the neuroscience of pain, migraine, pain strategies, sleep habits, exercise, nutrition, postural habits, and relaxation strategies) or CG (general health recommendations with no specific content about migraine). The intervention lasted a total of eight weeks and was delivered via a telehealth application (APP). Headache frequency, migraine frequency, pain intensity, headache impact, allodynia, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, chronic pain self-efficacy, anxiety and depression, sleep quality, and sedentary lifestyle were measured at baseline (M0), one month after the intervention started (M1), at the end of the intervention (M2), and one month after the intervention was completed for follow-up (M3). Results: In total, 48 patients participated. There were differences between the groups in the following outcomes in favor of EG for headache frequency at the one-month follow-up (p = 0.03; d = 0.681); chronic pain self-efficacy at post-treatment (p = 0.007; d = 0.885) and at the one-month follow-up (p < 0.001; d = 0.998); and sleep quality at post-treatment (p = 0.013; d = 0.786) and at the one-month follow-up (p < 0.001; d = 1.086). No differences existed between the groups for the other outcomes examined (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of TTEP reduced the number of headache days, improved sleep quality, and increased self-efficacy in managing pain. This pilot study suggests that the addition of a specialized TTPE to pharmacological treatments may be more effective than a general health recommendation program for migraine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.