The Asian summer monsoon anticyclone (ASMA) plays a vital role in the transport and redistribution of the tracers in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere during transient monsoon conditions. The ASMA can be identified using various diagnostics such as winds and divergence, potential vorticity, the Montgomery stream function or geopotential height. Its representation based on the commonly‐used existing method that takes a climatological range of the geopotential height (GPH) at a given pressure level is not robust and fails in several circumstances. In this study, we propose a new GPH method to define the ASMA for the active and break phases of the monsoon based on the GPH values at the tropical easterly jet (TEJ) and subtropical westerly jet (STJ) locations. The proposed method compares the GPH values at the locations corresponding to the wind speed maxima of TEJ and STJ at 100 hPa with the maximum GPH at 100 hPa and selects the one with the minimum difference to define the ASMA extent. The same procedures were applied to obtain the ASMA extent at 150 hPa. The ASMA extents are obtained using the method proposed here and the existing fixed GPH method for the 30 active and 27 break phases from 2005 to 2023. The fixed GPH method provides a larger ASMA extent for 24 active and 21 break phases, which appears to be an unrealistic estimation compared to the proposed method. Our proposed method identifies the ASMA extent that is larger and centred around the Iranian side during the active phases while it is smaller and centred around the Tibetan side during the break phases. Furthermore, the minimum concentration of ozone (O3), and maximum concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) and water vapour (H2O) are also found to be centred near the Iranian side during the active phases and on the Tibetan side during the break phases. The tracer concentrations are generally higher for CO, H2O and O3 during the active phase than in the break phase. Tracer concentrations within the ASMA extent using the fixed GPH method are higher for O3 while lesser for CO and H2O when compared to the proposed method.
