1964
DOI: 10.6028/nbs.tn.300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of the earth-ionosphere waveguide for VLF radio waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
466
0
7

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 491 publications
(485 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
12
466
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar, though smaller magnitude, ionospheric height variation has been reported by Han and Cummer [2010] based on frequencydomain measurements. The ionospheric heights cannot be compared directly between the two methods because the analysis in this paper determines the effective VLF/LF reflection height and the Han and Cummer method infers the exponential ionospheric profile height as defined in Wait and Spies [1964]. In addition to the general decrease in ionospheric height measured in this paper, ionospheric height splitting was detected in a localized region for a short time period (∼10 min), possibly indicating that two layers of higher electron density are present during that period.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar, though smaller magnitude, ionospheric height variation has been reported by Han and Cummer [2010] based on frequencydomain measurements. The ionospheric heights cannot be compared directly between the two methods because the analysis in this paper determines the effective VLF/LF reflection height and the Han and Cummer method infers the exponential ionospheric profile height as defined in Wait and Spies [1964]. In addition to the general decrease in ionospheric height measured in this paper, ionospheric height splitting was detected in a localized region for a short time period (∼10 min), possibly indicating that two layers of higher electron density are present during that period.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ambient electron density profile can be expressed as 29 : ARTICLE represent a typical nighttime electron density profile. The positive ion density n ion is assumed to be equal to the electron density at high altitudes where electron density has values larger than 10 8 m À 3 , and at lower altitudes the positive ion density is equal to 10 8 m À 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the ED changes (gradients) we have calculated percentage decrease in the ED (Table 1) using two methods. The method 1, as used by Guha et al [2010], is based upon the change in the VLF signal amplitude as compared to normal day and is used to estimate the Wait ionospheric parameters (H′ and β) which are used to estimate ED profile using relation N e (z) = 1.43 × 10 7 exp(À0.15H ')exp[(β À 0.15)(z À H ')] where N e (z) is the ED in cm À3 and H / is the D region reference height in km and β is the sharpness factor in km À1 [Wait and Spies, 1964]. The changes in ED due to the eclipse were calculated using normal daytime H′ = 71 km and β = 0.43 km À1 [Clilvered et al, 2001] and eclipse time H′ and β estimated using change in JJI signal amplitude for each TRGCP.…”
Section: 1002/2013ja019521mentioning
confidence: 99%