If we define Stimulus R as the signal to which S is instructed to respond as rapidly as possible, Stimulus A as an instructed, warning signal immediately preceding Stimulus R, and R as the overt response which S is instructed to perform, then various studies (3,7,9,10,14) suggest that the muscle action potential (MAP) increments normally preceding and accompanying R are observed, as a function of repeated trials, to creep forward into the interval between the initiation of Stimulus A and the initiation of Stimulus R. Here we have the establishment of conditioned MAP increments to a stimulus designated by instructions to S as antecedent.Will an antecedent stimulus about which S is not informed acquire the property of eliciting MAP increments in this situation? Specifically, can MAP increments accompanying an instructed, overt movement be condi-1 This article is based upon a dissertation submitted to the department of psychology of Indiana University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. The research was performed in conjunction with Air Force Contract No. 33(038)-19630. Thanks are due Dr. R. C. Davis, principal investigator of the contract.