1998
DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of the Subject and Interview Influencing the Test‐Retest Reliability of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents‐Revised

Abstract: This paper reviews some of the characteristics of the informants as well as some of the attributes of the DICA-R interview that could influence the test-retest reliability in a sample of 109 psychiatric outpatients aged 7-17 years. Different regression models using reliability coefficients constructed from the kappa statistic were obtained. Of those characteristics evaluated in the children, a high level of psychological impairment proved to be significant when it came to predicting the lowest test-retest reli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies of the test-retest reliability of the DISC suggest that the greater the length of the item, the greater the reduction in test-retest reliability (Fallon & Schwab-Stone, 1994;Perez, Ascaso, Domenech Massons, & de la Osa Chaparro, 1998). This was also the case for those DISC items that required recall of onset and offset of symptoms and the temporal relations between the onset of symptoms and impairments in adaptive functioning (Perez et al, 1998). The CDI does not include any such items, nor does it make such demands on recall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies of the test-retest reliability of the DISC suggest that the greater the length of the item, the greater the reduction in test-retest reliability (Fallon & Schwab-Stone, 1994;Perez, Ascaso, Domenech Massons, & de la Osa Chaparro, 1998). This was also the case for those DISC items that required recall of onset and offset of symptoms and the temporal relations between the onset of symptoms and impairments in adaptive functioning (Perez et al, 1998). The CDI does not include any such items, nor does it make such demands on recall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of information from young children (from the age of 7 years onwards) has been a matter of debate, as the content of clinical interviews could challenge the cognitive skills of younger children. Some studies on test-retest reliability maintain that age has no effect on the degree of reliability [29,30], while other studies report an increase in reliability with the age of children [31,32]. According to Puig-Antich et al [33], although a child's ability to report past status is limited, he/she is the best reporter for the present state of a mood disorder, inappropriate guilt, depressive mood, self-esteem, suicidal preoccupations, anxious worries may remain totally unknown to the parents, especially when they are not clearly associated with changes in behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due, in part, to the idea that researchers generally view self-report as unreliable (Dunning et al, 2004). Further, often children in particular are viewed as unreliable self-reporters in assessments of complex psychological constructs (e.g., hopelessness, anxiety and worry; Kazdin, Rodgers, & Colbus, 1986; Perez, Ascaso, Massons, & Chaparro, 1998; Schniering, Hudson, & Rapee, 2000). This view is often held despite a wealth of evidence that children can provide reliable and valid self-reports of complex constructs and behaviors (e.g., Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001; Hunsley & Mash, 2007; Mash & Hunsley, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%