2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristics of total mercury (TM) wet deposition: Scavenging of atmospheric mercury species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A supporting observation is that sites in the southern part of the study area (IN21, IN22, IN28, IL63 and KY10) had significantly higher weekly precipitation depths (p < 0.001) than sites in the northern part of the study area (IN34, MI52 and OH52). The substantial influence of precipitation depth on precipitation-Hg deposition has been reported by other research [10,16,[51][52][53].…”
Section: Spatial Patterns In Hg Depositionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A supporting observation is that sites in the southern part of the study area (IN21, IN22, IN28, IL63 and KY10) had significantly higher weekly precipitation depths (p < 0.001) than sites in the northern part of the study area (IN34, MI52 and OH52). The substantial influence of precipitation depth on precipitation-Hg deposition has been reported by other research [10,16,[51][52][53].…”
Section: Spatial Patterns In Hg Depositionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For instance, Li et al (2008) noted that the mean 24-h particulate-phase mercury concentration over the polluted area in Göteborg, Sweden did not exceed 12.5 ± 16.4 pg m −3 . Similar results were also obtained from measurements in Toronto (mean 18.0 pg m −3 , Song et al 2009) and a slightly higher mean Hg p concentration value was found in Seoul (26.3 ± 42.6 pg m −3 , Seo et al 2012). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…PHg concentration values are in pg m −3 , sampling sites are labeled as follows: ( C ) coastal, ( R ) rural, ( Re ) remote, ( U ) urban, and ( F ) forestSiteSite typeSeasonPHgReferencePoznań, PolandUApril 2013–October 2014Coarse, <MDL–604.9@fine, <MDL–77.1This studyGdynia, PolandC/UApril 2008–April 2009Coarse, 0.3–151.5@fine, 0.2–39.9Siudek et al (2011)Gdynia, PolandUDecember 2007–December 20082–142Beldowska et al (2012)Detroit, USAU20041.0–1345.2Liu et al (2010)Femman, SwedenU20053.89–20.26Li et al (2008)Beijing, ChinaU2003–2004180–3510Wang et al (2006)Toronto, CanadaUDecember 2003–November 200421.5Song et al (2009)Mexico City, MexicoUMarch 2006187 ± 300Rutter et al (2009)Xiamen, ChinaUMarch 2012–February 2013174.4Xu et al (2015)Guiyang, ChinaUAugust–December 20090–8407Fu et al (2011)Seoul, KoreaU200623.9 ± 42.6Seo et al (2012)Toronto, CanadaUDecember 2003–November 200414.2–39.2Zhang et al (2012)Changchun, ChinaU1999–2000276Fang et al (2004)Nanjing, ChinaUJune 2011–February 2012320–2040Zhu et al (2014)San Francisco Bay Area, USAU200880.8 ± 283Rothenberg et al (2010)Jeziory, PolandFApril 2013–October 2014Coarse, 20.8fine, 2.4This studyWaldhof, GermanyR2009–2011<0.4–262Weigelt et al (2013)Dexter...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a field study, Sakata and Asakura [2007] estimated that the average contributions to Hg wet deposition at 10 sites in Japan were 74% for GOM and 26% for total PBM. GOM was also scavenged more efficiently by precipitation than fine PBM in Seoul, South Korea based on scavenging coefficients of 750 for GOM and 380 for fine PBM [Seo et al, 2012]. However, at a rural location in Korea, strong correlations between the volume-weighted mean Hg concentrations in precipitation and fine PBM concentrations in air suggest that the total Hg wet deposition was primarily from fine PBM [Ahn et al, 2011].…”
Section: 1002/2015jd023769mentioning
confidence: 99%