2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and control of irrigation canal seepage losses: A review and perspective focused on field data

A.A. Rehman Lund,
Timothy K. Gates,
Joseph Scalia
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Review synthesized and evaluated by (Lund et al, 2023) indicated that seepage from unlined canals uctuates from 0.1 to 1 m 3 /day per m 2 . It was affected by factors such as properties of canal bed soil, geometry, wetted perimeter, ow depth, velocity, level of groundwater, vegetation, and water properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review synthesized and evaluated by (Lund et al, 2023) indicated that seepage from unlined canals uctuates from 0.1 to 1 m 3 /day per m 2 . It was affected by factors such as properties of canal bed soil, geometry, wetted perimeter, ow depth, velocity, level of groundwater, vegetation, and water properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively estimate seepage loss using numerical models, selecting consistent boundary conditions and developing seepage models based on these conditions is crucial. Previous research has explored seepage from earthen canals through direct measurements (Lund et al, 2023) or analytical studies (Sharma and Chawla, 1979;Chahar, 2007;Osman and Rahman, 2008;Ghazaw, 2011;Carabineanu, 2012;Uchdadiya and Patel, 2014). Empirical equations have been used and compared in earlier studies (Mowafy, 2001;Saha, 2015), while more recent research increasingly uses numerical modeling techniques (Salmasi and Abraham, 2020;El-Molla and El-Molla, 2021a,b;El-Molla and Eltarabily, 2023;Eltarabily et al, 2023a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%